As your sources point out, Cardinal Law isn’t in jail because he didn’t violate the criminal law. That’s an issue for the legislature of Massachusetts going forward (you can’t criminalize something after it’s already happened).
If I recall correctly, your original question was something to the effect of “How can the Catholic Church be considered authoritative if its leaders act improperly (transferring abusers from parish to parish, etc.)?” The answer lies in Scripture, in that properly given authority is to be obeyed, even if the person exercising that authority is hypocritical:
Matthew 23:1-5.
I’m sure you’ll agree with me that the current crop of Catholic Church leaders are properly teaching quite a few things – Jesus is Lord, the Godhead is three Persons in one God, Jesus was born of the virgin Mary for the salvation of the world, the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, Jesus never sinned, His Crucifixion and Resurrection saved humanity, etc. – despite whatever personal failings the individual leaders might exhibit. So, clearly, it’s possible to teach theology correctly notwithstanding personal sin.
The Holy Spirit prevents the Catholic Church from misleading its followers as to faith and morals. He does not prevent individual leaders in the Church from committing personal sin. We saw this in the Gospel, when Jesus was arrested and most of His followers fled; even Peter denied Him three times that night. Indeed, Peter even had to be corrected (later) about his conduct by Paul, because Peter withdrew from Gentile Christians at meals out of fear of criticism by Jewish Christians. But Peter never taught that Christians needed to be circumcised. The Apostles never misled their flock about Jesus, despite any personal failings. That’s because the Holy Spirit prevents it.
It’s not how sinful men lead members of Christ’s flock. It’s a given that we are all sinners and we are imperfect in our actions.
My question goes to what I see in Catholics who have deified the magisterium. Non-Catholic Christians leave it open than even though the pastor or teacher or leader is teaching truth – God is One, revealed in Trinity as an example – that the person teaching this truth is fallible.
The Catholic believes the body teaching the truth is infallible, not the truth itself.
That’s the difference.
When we elevate infallibly to any body other than to God it makes a god out of that body. It makes people put their faith in something other than God; which is idolatry.
The whole sexual abuse scandal is just horrible for everyone involved and for those that refuse to come to Christ due to this stumbling block. I know many Catholics believe this too.
If the Church is looking to make thing different in order to prevent this sort of situation from occurring again – how can it allow the perpetrators involved to remain as part of the infallible teaching office of the Church? This is even more scandal, and in my very fallible eyes most unwise.
Look at this from the outside.
Cardinal Law hides priests that have sexually abused members of their flocks for decades. It gets red hot in the press. Law resigns and then gets called to the Vatican by then Pope John Paul II. JPII dies and Law is on the board to elect the next pope. (Is the election of a pope considered a teaching on faith and as such an infallible selection?) Pope Benedict XVI is elected and Law continues his place in the Vatican as part of that Teaching Office. WTF?!!
And Catholic everywhere are astonished when non-Catholic level the charge of corruption in the Church.
Catholics have a solid grasp of the temporal punishment for sins, even if and when these sins have been repented of, confessed, and penance done. Wouldn’t the most basic temporal punishment for Law be to not be part of the official infallible teaching office of the Church?
I know that this thread is about Bishop Lahey and child porn charges, but the situation with Law is the spot light. If this is the way the Church handles these situations, not much has changed. The Church still just moves its problematic leaders around instead of dealing with it head on. These actions go to protect the perpetrators of these scandals and further perpetuate the scandal.
And what of forgiveness? Yes the Church should offer it just as Christ offers it to all who repent. Forgiveness of wrongs does not preclude the temporal punishment for those actions. At a minimum, being ousted from the inner circle of the infallible teaching office would seem appropriate and might even go to actually address the scandal itself.