C
I’m shocked!This World Net Daily article is completely disengenuous. It doesn’t even list the name of the movie. It is only designed to get people angry without giving them all of the facts.
That’s par for the course at World Net Daily.This World Net Daily article is completely disengenuous. It doesn’t even list the name of the movie. It is only designed to get people angry without giving them all of the facts.
So basically you are saying that striptease doesn’t incite lust?? How ridiculous is that.It wasn’t kiddie porn; it was Little Miss Sunshine. Porn is created specifically to incite lust. There is no way Little Miss Sunshine was designed to incite lust. The striptease in question was not at all provocative and was actually an ironic moment in the movie designed to show just how crass and sexually exploitative beauty pageants for young girls actually are. It was done in a way that was purely sweet and completely hysterical.
This World Net Daily article is completely disengenuous. It doesn’t even list the name of the movie. It is only designed to get people angry without giving them all of the facts.
"Underneath the zaniness, there’s an incredibly positive reinforcement of family and an affirmation of genuine values, especially in the ultimate pageant sequence, which underscores the superficiality and vulgarity of contemporary society, even though eyebrows may be raised at Olive’s onstage antics during the talent competition. Still, the real lesson is the importance of being true to oneself.As for the movie I can’t see how any sincere Catholic can approve that trash
Never mind the kiddie porn comment - forum rules state that you are not to change the title of posted articles.I apologise for saying its Kiddie Porn but when I read the article it got me quite upset. However perhaps this movie review is one you will be more open to hearing about: pluggedinonline.com/movies/movies/a0002832.cfm