Did Christ Have a Tattoo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Piusx
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Abitreckless:
My very first post with this forum, and I’m not impressed with the tactless criticism. Not a good welcome at all! 😦 :confused:
Yes I would agree.
 
40.png
Abitreckless:
My very first post with this forum, and I’m not impressed with the criticism. Not a good welcome at all! 😦 :confused:
It is the moderators role to keep a thread on track. As the moderator mentioned the thread topic is whether Jesus had a tattoo or not. Its not about if its okay to have your ears pierced.
Its very easy to digress (which I have also been gulity of in other threads) and threads end up discussing many different subjects and confusion reigns.
You should not take offence about being told to stick to the thread topic. That happens to many of us from time to time.
 
As a reminder, Enforcement Rule #3 of the Forum Rules prohibits posters from questioning moderator action on the thread. Any questions should be raised through Private Message. Future posts of this nature will result in modification of posting privileges.

Mane Nobiscum Domine,
Ferdinand Mary
 
I am bearing my cross, and hubly submitting to legitimate authority as I comment only on the topic of the thread at hand (God bless you Mod.) Jesus would not have had a tattoo, because it would have been in direct violation of Mosaic Law, which would have been impossible since He fulfilled the Mosaic Law perfectly. Jesus was a Jew, bound by Mosaic Law, and being tattooed would have been contrary to the Law by which He was bound. However, the NT tells us that our Salvation is not contingent on our fulfillment of “the Law” (Mosaic, or OT Law), so we are no longer bound by the Laws of the OT as Christ fulfilled the Law and through Him we are entered into a New Covenant with God. In short, Jesus would not have been tattooed, but if we are, then there is nothing in that that could hinder our Salvation or harm our relationship with Jesus. I once scoured the CAtechism on this one (being tattooed several times myself) and the Catechism is completely silent on the subject, so my conclusion is that the prohibition on tattooing is simply a Mosaic Law to which we are no longer bound (just like Kosher food laws, the OT sacrificial system, etc.).
 
Does that mean if you have a pierced ear, your’e in trouble?
You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh on account of the dead or tattoo any marks upon you: I am the Lord. (Le 19:28).

I wonder if a surgery is forbidden? because it involves cutting of flesh.
 
**I was asked if it was true that Christ had a tatoo on his inner thigh.
A lady told me that a teen-ager used this as a justification for getting a tattoo himself. Typical teen.
He told her that it was in Revelation that Jesus had one.
I told her that I did not believe it, but if anyone would know for sure, it would be this forum.
If the teen quoted Revelation, it must be something symbolic but not physically true.
Anyone know Revelation so well as to answer this?

Thanks
**
Well, if we take that literally, then we must believe that Jesus keeps a sword inside His mouth as well! 😉

Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! The one sitting on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war. His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems, and he has a name written that no one knows but himself. He is clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God. And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, were following him on white horses. From his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords.

Now, are there any teenagers out there that keeps sharp articles inside their mouths, because they could use this passage for justification! 😃

EDIT: Just noticed that this thread is over four-five years old! :eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top