J
Jerusha
Guest
I think the mods canned it because it was getting too controversial. There could have been some very anti-Mormon votes from the forum “next door” just before it got tossed into the trash-can.
Perhaps not, however, millions of dollars aren’t made and spent in trying to discredit him. Neither is there a forum dedicated on this board trying to debunk all the good teaching he gave to you. Perhaps you’re right though, enemies is to strong a word to describe the good folks on this board,We disagree with you that Joseph Smith is a true prophet of God, so therefore, we’re his enemies? I don’t think my dad is a true prophet of God, either, but I’m certainly not *his * enemy!
:
Have you done the same for your Mormon claim of “great apostasy”? Do you have a degree a PhD in Christian history? Theology?JGCase,
I suppose that you’re a PhD, have read several thoroughly researched books on Joseph Smith’s life including the latest, Rough Stone Rolling, have read and analyzed and dissected the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price and can explain them in great detail to the world, have read all of his letters and all of his other writings, have studied the cities he planned and his presidential platform and what all the people who knew him in life wrote about him–all this to arrive at your sincere and well-studied and completely reputable and scholarly and charitable opinion?
I have to agree with you. It appears someone’s true colors are starting to show.Have you done the same for your Mormon claim of “great apostasy”? Do you have a degree a PhD in Christian history? Theology?
This is nothing but an attempt to discredit the person, rather than address what is being said.
That’s funny! meanwhile, I don’t think there’s a lot of value in giving this thread new life, unless there’s any posters here qualified to make such a diagnosis. And what if it wereHas anyone noticed this thread is FOUR YEARS OLD, and that the OP hasn’t posted at CAF for over a year?
That’s “Stranger in a Strange Land.”From what I’ve observed, people who view Joseph Smith as a false prophet seem to mainly classify him into one of three categories: either he was *deceived * by a demon masquerading as Jesus in his initial vision, he was actually *possessed * by a demon, or he was simply a con-man who deliberately deceived others to gain power and wealth over them. I’m sure some even suspect some combination of two or more of these possibilities were in play.
I know someone who suffers from severe schizophrenia, and witnessing his affliction has resonated with what I’ve read about Joseph Smith’s life. (What few witnesses JS had to substantiate any of his claims proved to be very questionable, to my mind.) My friend spins me some really incredible tales, and, the thing is, he completely believes them to be absolutely true. If he had a more charismatic personality, I can certainly see the possibility of other people being drawn into his fantasy.
Could mental illness possibly be a factor in the rise of Joseph Smith as a religious leader…or, for that matter, the ascendency of Mohammed? (Their founding accounts are quite similar, as I’m sure you’ve noticed.) Every modern psychiatric ward has at least one patient who thinks he or she is Jesus, or some other messianic figure, after all. Given the non-existence of psychiatric medicine in his day, JS (and Mohammed) would have naturally remained in the general population.
There is a neo-pagan religious group that calls itself “The Church of All Worlds” (caw.org)), which found its origin in Robert Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange World.
Well, lessee…Of course, we all know “The Church of Scientology” (scientology.org) was deliberately founded by the science fiction writer, L. Ron Hubbard. I don’t find it at all hard to believe that these modern examples may have been preceded by a highly-functioning, mentally-ill man who dictated his schizophrenic fantasies to others, and then published them as The Book of Mormon.
This is something I’ve been thinking about for quite awhile. What do you think? Is this scenario possible? And, if it is, does that mean that JS (or Mohammed) is not completely responsible for any negative consequences to his actions/teachings?
My Jesus, mercy!
Interesting idea, Jerusha. Have you decided to change approaches, then?Realizing, on that basis, that there is a strong thread of cultural schizophrenia among Mormons. Therefore, dealing with their “delusions” with a rational, compassionate attitude.
There isn’t any of that sort of evidence to prove that anything Paul said is true, either.Unfortunately for the many nice, sincere, and well-intentioned people who *do * believe this, there doesn’t seem to be much substantial, objective evidence to support this particular option. Instead, quite the opposite is true.
We’ve already established that there is no way to determine today if JS was, or was not, suffering from schizophrenia. This is only my speculation, based on my experience with someone actually afflicted with this mental disorder, in our own time and culture.
As a Catholic, I certainly do acknowledge that God can speak more dramatically to any person He chooses than to the general population. The pious tradition of the Church is full of those people and events. The difference between the Catholic Church’s approach and the LDS’s, however, is that Christian faithful are never obliged to accept private revelation–which is what JS’s visions fall under–as equal to **public ** revelation as preserved in Sacred Tradition (including Scripture). Private revelation is only binding on the person to whom it’s given. **Authentic ** private revelation *never * divides the unity of the Church…which is exactly what JS’s private revelations and subsequent teachings sought to do, and continue to do today. Indeed, divisiveness is one of the tests of the authenticity of any particular person’s revelation experience. Thus, I conclude that JS’s visions do not have divine origin.
Personally, given the ongoing divisive (“contentious”) consequences of JS’s teachings, I would rather believe JS was *not * fully responsible (i.e., was mentally ill) for the deception of all the people who do believe in them, than that he deliberately deceived them, either under the influence of demonic activity or just his own perversity. I am certain that God, in His loving justice, has more mercy on the soul of someone who was genuinely mentally ill, than of someone who was not, when that soul comes before His throne, despite whatever the lingering consequences of that soul’s earthly actions.
My Jesus, mercy.
Is your dad claiming to be a prophet of God?We disagree with you that Joseph Smith is a true prophet of God, so therefore, we’re his enemies? I don’t think my dad is a true prophet of God, either, but I’m certainly not *his * enemy!
Jerusha, what happened to our poll? There was a good discussion going on there.![]()
Ceil-1;5818518 said:Amen!![]()
Fatima-style=many witnesses (tens of thousands) to the same miracle.Has anyone considered the possibility that Joseph Smith really did receive some sort of private revelation from the Lord? I don’t mean that the religion he subsequently built on it was true. But what if some sort of mental illness or greed or pride caused him to pervert and add to and modify what was originally a Fatima-style vision?