G
georgemiller
Guest
Is catholic doctrine that blessed mary actually experienced bodily death? Or are catholic free to believe that mary at the close of her life on was taken directly to heaven without going through bodily death?
The Church is silent on the question. However, the most ancient tradition and accounts (notably that of St. John Damascene) do tend toward the position that Mary did die. It is also the position I personally hold.Is catholic doctrine that blessed mary actually experienced bodily death? Or are catholic free to believe that mary at the close of her life on was taken directly to heaven without going through bodily death?
Nobody knows for certain whether or not the Blessed Virgin Mary died, but it seems to be that the most popular opinion is that she did indeed die first, her soul went to Christ, and then she was later resurrected and assumed bodily into heaven by God. This is the official stance of our Orthodox and Eastern Catholic brothers and sisters, and the most popular stance held among our fellow western Christians. Though my priest, for example, believes she did not die but was just assumed into heaven.Is catholic doctrine that blessed mary actually experienced bodily death? Or are catholic free to believe that mary at the close of her life on was taken directly to heaven without going through bodily death?
While I agree with part of your post, I disagree with the main point of it. The part I agree with is this: the tradition that Mary did die seems to have stronger support in tradition, and this is true in both East and West, including in the 1700s and up to today. That said, I don’t agree that the opposing theory is “new” or that it arose in the 1700s. If we go by the evidence of ancient documents (which are admittedly not just incomplete, but woefully so – and perhaps secondary to the liturgical evidence on this topic), both theories have been around about just as long, though the “didn’t die” theory has less support.The idea that She didn’t die is a modern Western novelty. I don’t think you can find it prior to the 1700s. While Prius XII didn’t dogmatize her death, he speaks of her death in the same encyclical in which he promulgated the dogma of Her Assumption. It is the unquestioned tradition of the East where this feast is called the Dormition, or Falling Asleep, of the Mother of God. The ancient tradition is that she died and then shared in the resurrection of Her Son.
Why would the Lord deprive Her of that glory? All of the saints get to share in His resurrection but His own Mother does not? If She didn’t die, it also, I feel, compromises the nature of this feast as a foretaste or promise of the Church’s ultimate destiny. Our Lady is the perfect prototype of the Church, thus it would be fitting that She first died and then rose again in Christ.
Today is the feast of the Assumption, when the Blessed Mother was assumed (taken bodily) into heaven. No death!Is catholic doctrine that blessed mary actually experienced bodily death? Or are catholic free to believe that mary at the close of her life on was taken directly to heaven without going through bodily death?
The Assumption doesn’t mean she didn’t die. It means her body and soul were taken into heaven. Whether or not she died first has been left as an open question by the Magisterium, though most of the Church Fathers who discuss this lean toward the opinion that she did die shortly before her Assumption. St. John Damascene has a famous homily about this; Google St. John Damascene Assumption.Today is the feast of the Assumption, when the Blessed Mother was assumed (taken bodily) into heaven. No death!
Well said!The idea that She didn’t die is a modern Western novelty. I don’t think you can find it prior to the 1700s. While Prius XII didn’t dogmatize her death, he speaks of her death in the same encyclical in which he promulgated the dogma of Her Assumption. It is the unquestioned tradition of the East where this feast is called the Dormition, or Falling Asleep, of the Mother of God. The ancient tradition is that she died and then shared in the resurrection of Her Son.
Why would the Lord deprive Her of that glory? All of the saints get to share in His resurrection but His own Mother does not? If She didn’t die, it also, I feel, compromises the nature of this feast as a foretaste or promise of the Church’s ultimate destiny. Our Lady is the perfect prototype of the Church, thus it would be fitting that She first died and then rose again in Christ.
How could she possibly die if she was exempted from original sin?Is catholic doctrine that blessed mary actually experienced bodily death? Or are catholic free to believe that mary at the close of her life on was taken directly to heaven without going through bodily death?
In one of the nigh-infinite number of ways one can die aside from bodily disease.How could she possibly die if she was exempted from original sin?