A
archangel04
Guest
Today in my pre-confirmation class, one of my students kept telling me that the Church had St. Joan of Arc condemned to burn! Is this true? She told me that her history teacher told her this.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
M
miguel
Guest
The English were behind it. But they got corrupt churchmen to do their bidding. Mark Twain wrote an excellent book about St. Joan of Arc. It’s published by Ignatius Press. He was a fan. Treat yourself.Today in my pre-confirmation class, one of my students kept telling me that the Church had St. Joan of Arc condemned to burn! Is this true? She told me that her history teacher told her this.
Z
zerubbabel
Guest
Yes, That’s what Jesus would have done: BURN PEOPLE ALIVE AT THE STAKE!..Doesn’t this sound exactly like what the King of Babylon Nebuchadnezzar did?..Hmmm, looks like “God’s Rottweiler” has some explaining (or tap dancing around) to do on this topic. And for the record: “NO” , the English did NOT have Joan of Arc burned alive at the stake. I never heard such a lie with NO proof being passed around as fact before as lame as this pathetic excuse/lie that is perpetrated is!..Rome and the Vatican just needs to stop making excuses, placing blame, scapegoating everyone else but ITSELF, and be honest with people (and itself for that matter) and take FULL responsibility and accountability for every evil thing it has done in it’s long bloody history! Time to put on your big boy pants RCC, fess up and be HONEST! Denial has never done anyone any good…
S
SirWillliam
Guest
King Charles VII of France asked the Pope to review the Condemnation trial of Joan of Arc,
which the church agreed to in the 1450’s. It was found that there were numerous irregularities
in Joan’s original trail conducted by Bishop Cauchon and other French ecclesiastics. For
instance, Joan was not even given an advocate. She was finally condemned for wearing men’s clothing, which may have been a sin, but certainly was not heresy.
As a result of the Nullification Trial, the church in 1456 declared the verdict of Joan of Arc’s
Condemnation Trial null and void. This led eventually, after a long time, to her canonization
in 1919.
which the church agreed to in the 1450’s. It was found that there were numerous irregularities
in Joan’s original trail conducted by Bishop Cauchon and other French ecclesiastics. For
instance, Joan was not even given an advocate. She was finally condemned for wearing men’s clothing, which may have been a sin, but certainly was not heresy.
As a result of the Nullification Trial, the church in 1456 declared the verdict of Joan of Arc’s
Condemnation Trial null and void. This led eventually, after a long time, to her canonization
in 1919.
S
SirWillliam
Guest
King Charles VII of France asked the Pope to review the Condemnation trial of Joan of Arc,
which the church agreed to in the 1450’s. It was found that there were numerous irregularities
in Joan’s original trail conducted by Bishop Cauchon and other French ecclesiastics. They
were under the strong influence of the English, who hated and feared Joan because she had
defeated them soundly in battle at Orleans and Patay. So they tried to get the church to
convict Joan of heresy.
In her original trial, Joan was not even given an advocate. She was finally condemned for wearing men’s clothing, which may have been a sin, but certainly was not heresy.
As a result of the Nullification Trial, the church in 1456 declared the verdict of Joan of Arc’s
Condemnation Trial null and void. This led eventually, after a long time, to her canonization
in 1919.
which the church agreed to in the 1450’s. It was found that there were numerous irregularities
in Joan’s original trail conducted by Bishop Cauchon and other French ecclesiastics. They
were under the strong influence of the English, who hated and feared Joan because she had
defeated them soundly in battle at Orleans and Patay. So they tried to get the church to
convict Joan of heresy.
In her original trial, Joan was not even given an advocate. She was finally condemned for wearing men’s clothing, which may have been a sin, but certainly was not heresy.
As a result of the Nullification Trial, the church in 1456 declared the verdict of Joan of Arc’s
Condemnation Trial null and void. This led eventually, after a long time, to her canonization
in 1919.
S
SirWillliam
Guest
King Charles VII of France asked the Pope to review the Condemnation trial of Joan of Arc, which the church agreed to in the 1450’s. It was found that there were numerous irregularities in Joan’s original trail conducted by Bishop Cauchon and other French ecclesiastics. For instance, Joan was not even given an advocate. She was finally condemned for wearing men’s clothing, which may have been a sin, but certainly was not heresy.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.