J
jimmy
Guest
I have wondered for a while whether the Eastern Christians would say that the Essence of God was in Jesus or just the Energies.
“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.”I have wondered for a while whether the Eastern Orthodox would say that the Essence of God was in Jesus or just the Energies.
I was thinking of the same, and going one step further:“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.”
~ Colossians 2:9
“For in Him was pleased to dwell all the fullness of the Godhead.”
~ Colossians 1:19
At any rate, energies cannot be present without essence, nor essence without energies since they are inseparable though distinct. This is true for created beings as well, so too for God Incarnate.And so in connection with our Lord Jesus Christ, the power of miracles is the energy of His divinity, while the work of His hands and the willing and the saying, I will, be thou clean, are the energy of His humanity. And as to the effect, the breaking of the loaves, and the fact that the leper heard the “I will,” belong to His humanity, while the multiplication of the loaves and the purification of the leper belong to His divinity.
The one born of Mary is the Son by nature, God in essence. He is ‘the One Who Is’, the essential, natural reality of the divine Son; and thus when one encounters the incarnate Christ, one encounters the divine nature (essence) of God. And yet, one encounters the divine nature energetically; for even in God’s incarnation, one cannot know the nature of God qua essence. In Christ one experiences in energy the divine essence in the fullest degree.
This is true also of the eucharistic mystery. One receives into one’s body the full reality of the essentially and ever-existing God; but it is precisely in God’s energy that one thus receives him fully and truly. The experience of God ‘in his energies’ is not an experience ‘less than’ an experience of his essence. There is no such thing as a created experience of an uncreated essence qua essence; it should not be considered a ‘higher category’ of experience.
Sounds like you are separating the person from the essence.Since the divine essence and the divine energy are common to the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit through perichoresis, it follows that it is only the eternal and uncreated hypostasis of the Son that assumed human nature and became man through the incarnation.
His point is that both the essence and the energies are present since they are both common to all three persons and Christ is the incarnation of the Son.Sounds like you are separating the person from the essence.
My point exactly.His point is that both the essence and the energies are present since they are both common to all three persons and Christ is the incarnation of the Son.
It is not to seperate essence from person. The essence of the Trinity is the Father, who begets the Son and Spirates the Spirit. So the essence can not be seperated from the three persons, it is one and the same as the persons. There is no distinction within God. The energies are Gods actions within the world.
Yes. Any other answer would expose Easterns and Orientals to the di-theism polemicists impose on our belief.Related question: does the Eucharist contain the Essence of God?