P
PiousTemplar
Guest
Sorry, I’m just simply saying what I learnt in History Class. Thanks for the info!Nonsense.
Aboriginal culture simply collapsed upon the arrival of the white settlers. Their beleif systems and world view were totally nullified when white Europeans came riding along on strange animals, seemingly having food supplies on tap and with the power to harness energy in ways the Aborigines found unfathomable. They also had absolutely no immunity to the diseases white settlers bought with them, like chicken pox, measles, small pox and whatever else. Certain tribes showed signs of having had small pox well before white explorers even got to them, suggesting the disease had travelled overland well before the arrival of white men.
The Christianisation of some of the Aborigines came after the intial culture shock had led many of them to abandon their traditional way of life. The large groups of Aborigines permanently camped around the settlements and towns caused great consternation amongst government oficials and led to the formation of Aboriginal Protectorate Boards. Still the decline continued.
As the article points out -
However, the British Government and colonial humanitarians were concerned about the fate of Aboriginal people as settlement progressed. After the failure of an early Protectorate system, the Victorian Colonial Government decided to allocate reserves of land variously known as stations, missions or reserves on which Aboriginal people could live. While the Government ran some Aboriginal stations, others were in the control of missionaries such as those of the Anglican or Moravian Churches. Regardless of their secular or religious management, life on Aboriginal stations revolved around efforts to control and ‘civilise’ Aboriginal people.
The Missions were set up to save the Aboriginals from extinction. The only way it could be seen to save them was to ‘modernise’ them and the Christian Missionaries Christianised their charges. However, Aboriginal culture was all but destroyed before the missions were even set up. For you to suggest otherwise is rediculously wrong and to link what happened in the 18th century with a U.N, charter is equally as rediculous. The U.N. didn’t even exist back then. Next thing you’ll be telling us the invasion of Britain by the Romans was against the U.N. Charter.