D DeFide Guest Jul 7, 2005 #2 Not that I’m aware of. Here’s some related reading: geocities.com/thecatholicconvert/deuterocanonicals.html geocities.com/thecatholicconvert/biblegrahamch12.html
Not that I’m aware of. Here’s some related reading: geocities.com/thecatholicconvert/deuterocanonicals.html geocities.com/thecatholicconvert/biblegrahamch12.html
B buzzcut Guest Jul 7, 2005 #3 As far as I know Wycliffe translated from the Vulgate, not the Hebrew and Greek. Would he have had any reason to drop any books?
As far as I know Wycliffe translated from the Vulgate, not the Hebrew and Greek. Would he have had any reason to drop any books?
G Gottle_of_Geer Guest Jul 7, 2005 #4 mark a: Or did he boot any at all? Click to expand... He didn’t boot any - as an inspection of the 1850 reprint by Forshall & Madden of the two earliest Wycliffite Bibles shows.I hope a myth is is not in the making here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyclif’s_Bible ##
mark a: Or did he boot any at all? Click to expand... He didn’t boot any - as an inspection of the 1850 reprint by Forshall & Madden of the two earliest Wycliffite Bibles shows.I hope a myth is is not in the making here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyclif’s_Bible ##
C ComradeAndrei Guest Jul 7, 2005 #5 I think that is right, he included everything that was in the Vulgate-he just really misinterpreted it.
I think that is right, he included everything that was in the Vulgate-he just really misinterpreted it.