Different Forms of the Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter mullenpm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mullenpm

Guest
I would like to have information to learn about all the different forms of the Mass that one reads about on this web site.

I have asked on several threads about the OF, EF, TLM, NO and all I get is an answer telling me what the initials stand for. I know what the initials stand for.

I want to read it somewhere (from an authority) what exactly are the differences and how would I be able to tell if I attend Mass at a church other than my own, what form I am participating in.

Any links please. :confused: 🤷
 
OF is the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It is the same thing as the NO - which means the Novus Ordo (Latin for New Order). It is sometimes called the Pauline Mass, the Mass of Pope Paul VI, or Mass according to the 1970 Roman Missal.

EF is the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It is the same thing as the TLM (Traditional Latin Mass) or the Tridentine Mass.
It is also sometimes referred to as the Gregorian Rite, the usus antiquior - the “ancient use” of Mass, the Mass of Blessed Pope Jonn XXIII, the Mass of Pope Saint Pius V, or Mass according to the 1962 Roman Missal.

You can compare the 2 side by side here.

Most parishes offer the OF. It became the normative Mass for Roman Catholics in 1970 (actually the 1st Sunday of Advent 1969). The official language of this Mass is Latin. But, there are official translations in many, many different languages.

Even though, according to the 2nd Vatican Council, Latin was supposed to be retained in the Mass after vernacular languages were permitted, it is incredibly difficult (and in many places impossible) to find any Latin used at all. This Mass is known to many people in the U.S. as the “English Mass”.

Odds are that if you stop into an unfamiliar Catholic parish this will be the Mass used. It could be in English, Spanish, Latin (highly unlikely) or any number of other languages.

The EF on the other hand is always celebrated in Latin. The sermon will typically given in English (or Spanish, or whatever the primary language of the people happens to be). It is also permissible for the Readings to be in the vernacular. More commonly, however, is for the priest to read them in Latin and then reread them in another language at the start of the sermon.

The EF Mass is the Mass familiar to most Roman Catholics for many centuries. The nickname “Tridentine Mass” implies a connection to the Council of Trent. But it is really much older than that - back to the time of Pope Gregory the Great (hence the name Gregorian Rite).

After the introduction of the Novus Ordo Mass it was only permitted to be said with the permission of the local bishop until 2007 when Pope Benedict XVI released his Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum. He made it clear that the Traditional Latin Mass had never been legally suppressed and therefore any Roman Catholic priest could offer it.

**The Roman Missal promulgated by Paul VI is the ordinary expression of the ‘Lex orandi’ (Law of prayer) of the Catholic Church of the Latin rite. Nonetheless, the Roman Missal promulgated by St. Pius V and reissued by Bl. John XXIII is to be considered as an extraordinary expression of that same ‘Lex orandi,’ and must be given due honour for its venerable and ancient usage. These two expressions of the Church’s Lex orandi will in no any way lead to a division in the Church’s ‘Lex credendi’ (Law of belief). They are, in fact two usages of the one Roman rite.

It is, therefore, permissible to celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass following the typical edition of the Roman Missal promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962 and never abrogated, as an extraordinary form of the Liturgy of the Church.**
*(Summorum Pontificum, Article 1)
*

**In Masses celebrated without the people, each Catholic priest of the Latin rite, whether secular or regular, may use the Roman Missal published by Bl. Pope John XXIII in 1962, or the Roman Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1970, and may do so on any day with the exception of the Easter Triduum. For such celebrations, with either one Missal or the other, the priest has no need for permission from the Apostolic See or from his Ordinary.
***(Summorum Pontificum, Article 2)

*Does this answer your questions?

James
 
James, thank you so much.

Yes, I will study your post carefully but I believe you have supplied what I was looking for.

I went to Catholic school and we had to attend Mass every morning before school began, so you can tell I have been around a long time.

I get distressed when posters on this site seem to disparage the changes in the Mass and imply that people who attend the NO Mass are in some way, no longer “real” Catholics.

Thank you again.:tiphat:
 
There are also a few other rarely celebrated forms of the Mass in the Western branch of the Catholic Church. The Ambrosian Rite is usually only allowed in the Archdiocese of Milan, Italy, and the Mozarabic Rite is only allowed at the Cathedral of Toledo, Spain, and six other nearby churches. Religious orders also have their own variants, like the Dominican and Carthusian Rites. To most people, however, they would be indistinguishable from the Extraordinary Form. The differences are very minor.

The Eastern Catholic Church has several forms of the Divine Liturgy as well, such as the Liturgy of St. John Crysostom, the Holy Qorbono, and the Liturgy of St. James.
 
James, thank you so much.

Yes, I will study your post carefully but I believe you have supplied what I was looking for.
You are welcome.
I went to Catholic school and we had to attend Mass every morning before school began, so you can tell I have been around a long time.

I get distressed when posters on this site seem to disparage the changes in the Mass and imply that people who attend the NO Mass are in some way, no longer “real” Catholics.

Thank you again.:tiphat:
I typically attend the Extraordinary Form on Sundays. And it has done wonders for my faith. But, some of the most faithful Catholics I know and some of the holiest people I have ever met attend the Novus Ordo Mass.

James
 
There are also a few other rarely celebrated forms of the Mass in the Western branch of the Catholic Church. The Ambrosian Rite is usually only allowed in the Archdiocese of Milan, Italy, and the Mozarabic Rite is only allowed at the Cathedral of Toledo, Spain, and six other nearby churches. Religious orders also have their own variants, like the Dominican and Carthusian Rites. To most people, however, they would be indistinguishable from the Extraordinary Form. The differences are very minor.
Good point.

The Traditional Dominican Rite is used here. And the Dominican Rite is occasionally used in this parish as well as a number of other places.

And then there is the Anglican Use of the Roman Rite used in 6 parishes in the United States. I would very much love to experience this some day.

James
 
Hi Mullenpm,

Let me say I too get a little upset at posters who make bad remarks about the OF and those who attend them.

But anyway I have some reading resources on the Mass (OF)

Dictionary of th Liturgy- Rev. Jovian P. Lang, OFM
CATHOLIC BOOK PUBLISHING CO.- New York
Oh this book covers just about covers everything. Note: This is a 1989 Edition, I think they have a revised edition now.

The How-To Book of the Mass: Everything You Need to Know But No One Ever Taught You.- Michael Dubruiel
OUR SUNDAY VISITOR PUBLISHING DIVISION
Our Sunday Visitor, Inc.- Indiana

Your One-Stop Guide to THE MASS- Fr.Dale Fushek & Bill Dodds
CHARIS BOOKS- SERVANT PUBLICATIONS, Ann Arbor, MI

I hope that helps you at least with the OF Mass
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top