Diocesan funding decades ago?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sheeniac
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Sheeniac

Guest
In discussing the Annual Appeal with my SO, he said that there were no appeals for the bishops ‘back jn the day’. Is this true?

If so, how did they fund things?

Thanks!
 
The use of a "bishop’s appeal " campaign in U.S. dioceses, where people pledge directly to the diocese on an annual basis, varies from diocese to diocese. Some have had this type of annual campaign for many years, others have adopted it more recently.

The universal norm is the cathedraticum, a tax paid directly from the parishes to the diocese annually. It’s usually somewhere around 5-10% of collections.

Most U.S. dioceses have both an annual appeal campaign and the cathedraticum.

I’d say the rise of the bishop’s appeal is based on two things: an attempt to engage people directly with the work of the diocese and expand that work and the rise of the paid lay staff (in contrast to religous sisters and priests doing these ministries back in the day, or the ministry not existing).

I think appeal is around 80% of many diocesan budgets with cathedraticum making up about 20%. Before lay staff, the diocese could probably make it on the cathedraticum alone.

In our diocese, if your parish doesn’t make its appeal target, the parish must make up the difference. Our diocese has both the appeal and the cathedraticum.
 
Our Canadian Diocese functions with Cathedraticum and an annual appeal for the Shepherds’ Fund, money specifically for the priests retirement fund.
 
In discussing the Annual Appeal with my SO, he said that there were no appeals for the bishops ‘back jn the day’. Is this true?

If so, how did they fund things?

Thanks!
it depends on when you have in mind when you say “back in the day.”
 
His words, but perhaps in the 70s?
~~
I figured that the diocese collected money directly from the parishes instead, but wanted more information before I said that to him.
 
His words, but perhaps in the 70s?
~~
I figured that the diocese collected money directly from the parishes instead, but wanted more information before I said that to him.
Oh, I’m guessing that he meant further back than that. Social and other services provided by dioceses gradually grew throughout the 20th century, with an especially large uptick since the 1960s. This created new needs. And as others have mentioned, the decline in clerical and religious vocations was a huge factor, as well. Rather than simply apportioning money from their general funds, and making occasional second collections, new and steadier streams of revenues had to be created.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top