Discouraged from studying Bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rhonda_in_GA
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rhonda_in_GA

Guest
I’ve read the CCC re: the Church exhorting the people to faithfully read the Bible. In a Bible study today, a man said that he was discouraged from reading the Bible (20-30 years ago).

I realize that this was likely a practice in some areas of the country but was it ever actually a Church teaching that the laity not read the Bible? I don’t think so, but thought I’d check to make sure.

Rhonda in GA
 
On the contrary, Catholics have always been encouraged to study the Bible and Biblical teachings.

Of course, in the early years of the church, there was no written Bible. And for the 1000 years between the first written Bible (the Vulgate of St. Jerome) and the advent of Gutenberg’s Printing Press in the late 15th century, Bibles were RARE. They had to be copied by hand, for one thing. Because they were considered to impart the words of GOD, they were made to be exceedingly beautiful and valuable. Also, in those 1000 years, up til around the year 1500, the majority of the people were illiterate. Priests, clergy, nuns were educated, and they read their Bible, the priests instructed the men (it was mostly men), the nuns worked with women and children, all usually under the aegis of the local monastery and supported by the lord of the manor (which could vary between a duke, earl, knight, count. . .and later smaller fry like squires or even reeves or sheriffs). Around the year 1000, the organ began to be popular and sacred music which could be taught to the people helped make them more aware of some Scripture. Also around 1200 St. Dominick popularized the rosary, or the “little Psalter”. Educated priests read the 150 Psalms; the illiterate serf or peasant recited his Pater, Ave, and Gloria, with 150 Aves standing in for the Psalms. Also at this time, the “mystery plays” were done by skilled actors and troubadors. Some of the earliest extant plays in early and middle English included “The Second Shepherd’s Play” which told the story of the Nativity. There were also “Adam and Eve” and the “Passion Plays” (a very famous play which is still performed at 10 year intervals in Oberamergau in Germany). These helped educate an unlettered society.
In the 1200s there was a resurgence of a heresy, the Albigensian heresy. These heretics were writing their OWN bibles and trying to pass them off as real. At THIS TIME, in THIS area (France and Lorraine), the laity were told not to read these FAKE bibles. This was in order to keep the laity from being exposed to heresy.

When Gutenberg’s press arrived, almost at the start of the Protestant Reformation, those Protestant groups also printed out “THEIR” Bibles. Many faithful people in countries which suffered cruelly during this time experienced great difficulty in obtaining Bibles, and venerated them dearly. They weren’t kept by the CHURCH from obtaining them, though. People in England, Scotland and Ireland could be KILLED if they were caught reading the “Catholic” bible, or hearing Mass, or harboring a priest. In fact, a Catholic did not receive full rights or status as an English person in England until 1829. In many cases, he could not attend a university or inherit property.

Yet, throughout history, from the Irish monks saving not just Bibles, but great works of literature in the 7th century from the Muslim advance. . .through today, when every Tom, Dick, or Dan (Brown) attempts to “rewrite” the Bible. . .the Catholic, be he priest or laity, has honored, read, studied, and loved the Bible.
 
just got off another thread on this topic, I think it starts with a poll, lots of opinions and experiences for you
 
Interestingly enough, in my (c)1970 Bible, there’s a note that “A partial indulgence is granted to the faithful who use Sacred Scripture for spiritual reading with the veneration due the Word of God. A plenary indulgence is granted if the reading continues for at least one half hour.” (Cite: Enchiridion Indulgentiarum, 1968 edition, no. 50)

I was under the impression that attaching an indulgence to a particular activity was meant to encourage participation in said activity. To me, this cite would give a definite answer that the laity had an encouragement to read/study the Bible for at least the last 36 years (well covering the time cited by the fellow the OP mentioned). Now, I’m sure that people would have been discouraged from participating in Protestant Bible studies, but that’s a whole 'nother ball of wax, as then you’re getting not only study of scripture but also attempted indoctrination in Protestant interpretations of scripture.
 
Reading the Bible,
As a kid I was given a New Testament. I was a good reader and read it thinking I would find some secret or special information. But a 12 year old mind without any guidence didn’t find much that seemed to be special.

Then in my 20s I looked at the Bible a bit, but found little of importance. I found the Saint Joseph’s Missal to be more useful.

But about 10 years ago I started reading radomly and started to find things I’d never seen before. A year ago I shelled out for a Douay-Rheims Bible. I started comparing it to an old KJV Bible and then to a NIV Bible. Now that sort of study/comparison gave me a new appreciation of what has been saved by Holy Mother Church.

I think if you give a man a Bible and expect him to extract form it the Catholic Religion you are not going to get anywhere. We need Tradition and the Magisterium to understand the Bible…
 
Hi, I am Catholic and recently I started to look into buying a Bible but I am at a loss as to which on to buy. I am new at starting to read the Bible so does anyone have any suggestions on which one to get? Any comments would be helpful. Thanks.
 
The Church never forbided the Fatihfull from reading the Bible. But until very recently the Fatihfull was actually able to read it due to modern education and mass printing.

But there is still some truth to your statement, some bishops and priests did discourage the Faithfull from reading the bible, but this is their error not the Church’s.
 
40.png
Cagrl:
Hi, I am Catholic and recently I started to look into buying a Bible but I am at a loss as to which on to buy. I am new at starting to read the Bible so does anyone have any suggestions on which one to get? Any comments would be helpful. Thanks.
The New American Bible is a good one…Catholic version of course. 👍
 
On Bible translations–the one you’ll read is best, but try to avoid anything that has that hideous linguistic abomination known as “inclusive language”. I’ve got an old (c)1970 New American and the Douay-Rheims.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top