T
Tigg
Guest
How very glad we are that you can confirm what many have been saying. This very question (and subsequent argument) came up in one of the many threads on the synod debate. A footnote had appeared in a document written by Cardinal DePaolis in which the above referenced canon was stated with the three conditions. Further clarification was given by another source that even the request of the sick to “call a priest” indicates contrition.A priest must always offer to hear the person’s confession before Anointing (so far as this is possible).
Here’s the canon again
Can. 1007 The anointing of the sick is not to be conferred upon those who obstinately persist in a manifestly grave sin.
The word manifest means (by definition) that the sin itself is public. It’s on display, so to speak. When we look at the sentence as a whole, the criteria is “obstinately persists” in a “manifest” grave sin.
So there are 3 conditions:
Those 3 combined make for a very high standard to cause the priest to not-confer (delay) the sacrament of Anointing. Circumstances such as these (all 3 together) are very rare indeed.
- grave sin
- obstinately persists (not merely persists, but obstinately/stubbornly so)
- the sin (and/or the persistence to continue the sin) is manifest
Does that help?