Do Any Catholics Read the K.J.V?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dempsey1919
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, the word unicorn is stated in Psalms 91:11, which is Psalm 92:10 in the KJV. and no the word cockatrice doesn’t appear in the Douay-Rheims, but it occurs 3 times in the KJV.
If one needs to look a verse up studylight.org is a great place to find it. They only have 2 Catholic versions online though, but plenty of Protestant. They have the Douay-Rheims and Latin Vulgate. So if you want to know if something is the Douay that is in the KJV all you have to do is go that site
 
Yes, the word unicorn is stated in Psalms 91:11, which is Psalm 92:10 in the KJV. and no the word cockatrice doesn’t appear in the Douay-Rheims, but it occurs 3 times in the KJV.
If one needs to look a verse up studylight.org is a great place to find it. They only have 2 Catholic versions online though, but plenty of Protestant. They have the Douay-Rheims and Latin Vulgate. So if you want to know if something is the Douay that is in the KJV all you have to do is go that site
Thanks! I will check it out.
 
I love trivia and that is interesting. Does the DR version have unicorns and cockatrices in it, as does the KJV?
The KJV does have the word ‘unicorn’ in it, but first we need to point out the following (copied almost verbatim from a post made by me a long while ago):

The word unicorn (uni+cornus) means ‘one-horned’, and was used in the KJV to translate the Hebrew word re’em, of obscure meaning (Jewish translations left it untranslated, or so I’ve heard) but may mean ‘wild ox’ (perhaps an auroch, a species of cattle that went extinct in the year 1627) due to the affinity of re’em to the Akkadian word rimu (cognate to Assyrian remu and Ugaritic r’m). The Akkadian word may be directly derived from alim “powerful,” although the former is also thought to have Semitic roots from a word meaning “to be high” and thought to refer to the animal’s sweeping horns. Rimu is often used to translate Sumerian am “bull, wild bull.”

*http://www.christiansofiraq.com/Rimu.jpg

A depiction of a bull in Assyrian Art. Note that the two horns appear as a single one, being depicted symmetrically sideways (as is the case in Egyptian and Assyrian art).



An auroch, the re’em of the Bible?*

Perhaps the translators of the Septuagint knew the depiction of bulls in art which looks like they show them with only one horn, so they chose to translate re’em as monokeros (‘one-horned’).

Jerome renders the word re’em as rinoceros in
-Numbers 23: 22, 24:8
-Deuteronomy 33: 17
-Job 39; 9-10
-Psalm (Jerome’s translation from the Hebrew, aka the Versio juxta Hebraicum or the Hebrew Psalter) 29 (28): 6 (7)

As unicornus in:
-Psalm 22 (21): 21 (22)
-Psalm (Jerome’s translation from the Septuagint, aka the Versio Gallicana or the Gallican Psalter) 29 (28): 6 (7)
-Psalm (Versio Gallicana) 92 (91): 10 (11)
-Isaiah 34: 7

And finally as monoceros in:
-Psalm (Versio juxta Hebraicum) 92 (91): 10 (11)

The version of the Psalms usually included in the Vulgate and the one commonly used in the Church is the Gallican Psalter, which renders all incidence of re’em as unicornus, a translation of the Greek word monokeros. Early translations of the Bible (at least in English) thus followed suit in rendering re’em as ‘unicornus’.
 
The NAB is one of the worst translations available. I prefer the RSV-CE and D-R, but I will read the KJV rather than the NAB. There is no inclusive language in the KJV, and it is possible to buy a KJV without any footnotes at all. The footnotes in the NAB are awful.
It isn’t about inclusive language or any other minor issue you want to bring up. It is about being faithfull to the teachings of the Church and not giving in to protestants who want to kill us.

I will even tell you to avoid the RSV-CE because it relys on the KJV. BE a good Catholic and avoid the heresy that is in those books. Learn to read Latin and read the Vulgate. I can tell you know that there is NO inclusive language in the Vulgate since that would be grammatically wrong for the language.

Our goal in life is to be Catholic, holy and to get to heaven, not to agree with protestant heresy to fit in better in American life.

Plus, the KJV and the RSV sound like German. It is bearly English. You want to read that go ahead but I want to be a Catholic and I will read the version of the Bible that the Catholic Church says is correct and that I can understand. I can’t understand the German sounding whatever that is in the KJV or the RSV. So I read a real language, Latin. Latin is best.
 
It isn’t about inclusive language or any other minor issue you want to bring up. It is about being faithfull to the teachings of the Church and not giving in to protestants who want to kill us.

I will even tell you to avoid the RSV-CE because it relys on the KJV. BE a good Catholic and avoid the heresy that is in those books. Learn to read Latin and read the Vulgate. I can tell you know that there is NO inclusive language in the Vulgate since that would be grammatically wrong for the language.

Our goal in life is to be Catholic, holy and to get to heaven, not to agree with protestant heresy to fit in better in American life.

Plus, the KJV and the RSV sound like German. It is bearly English. You want to read that go ahead but I want to be a Catholic and I will read the version of the Bible that the Catholic Church says is correct and that I can understand. I can’t understand the German sounding whatever that is in the KJV or the RSV. So I read a real language, Latin. Latin is best.
I too agree with avoiding the RSV-CE, it is an awful translation to begin with
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top