B
buffalo
Guest
The thread title is what Catholics believe.Sorry, Buffalo. I know you don’t frequent this area. The BOM and the Mormon church teaches that. I’ll send you a PM with links later.
The thread title is what Catholics believe.Sorry, Buffalo. I know you don’t frequent this area. The BOM and the Mormon church teaches that. I’ll send you a PM with links later.
No assumptions here, I asked a clarifying question, in light of your reference to JFK Jr.such an assumption on your part about the Catholic church is very erroneous.
Sorry, but they do not let such things slide, ever ever ever. The only reason he would not be tried in a Bishop’s court and excommunicated for adultry is if he, for some reason did not realize the seriousness of the crime or it was a one time thing and he truly repented for his sin. In his case he would be excommunicated, regardless of how long it has been, it is part of the repentance process. Having been a Bishop he knew better than to commit adultry. He can not ask for modification of LDS teachings any more than a Catholic can ask the RCC to modify it’s teachings. We believe as you do, that our teachings come from God. You can not tell God what to do.The general concensus among Catholics is that there was no world-wide flood. It was probably regional.
Here is a general and objective rundown of current DNA research:
ancestrybydna.com/Ethnicities.asp#AfricanJews
There is some minimal evidence for Mycenaen-Minoan adventures into the New World, substantiated by the Legend of Atlantis, and a possibility that they brought back slaves from the New World. That is all. Other researchers are working on the possibility that the Vikings invaded from the North, and left behind some genetic evidence. A “live” pure DNA profile is available from Iceland.
Dr. Southerton is NOT a virulent anti-Mormon. All he is asking for is a drastic modification of LDS teachings. He has great compassion for people like you.
He is not being brought to church court for adultery, and you know it. It is only an excuse. They would generally let such a thing slide, especially in a person who has been inactive for so long.
I would hope that JFK - like we common folk would do - confessed and was forgiven his adultery. In the RCC we see sin as something that, confessed, can and will be forgiven.I don’t know what you are trying to say here? Are you saying that the Catholic Church only disciplines the common folk, and lets the rich and famous off the hook?
Nope, a parish cannot excommunicate anyone, it has to come from Rome in either a decree for an automatic type or they hold a hearing of sorts there and issue a specific excommunication.Excommunication in the Catholic church is, if I am not mistaken, a very quiet matter handled on a parish level, certainly not in a court-room setting.
The Church never ex communicates in private. One of the motivations of ex communications is to warn the faithful not to follow a certain path. This can only be done publicly. Jerusha is mistaken.After reading all of the above statements concerning the flood, it seems to me that there are personal theories about the extent of the flood among the Catholics, just as there are among the Mormons.
I personally have never heard an official LDS Church proclamation concerning the flood. I personally believe that God has the power to flood the earth and I always have taken the bible literally in the sense of a universal flood.
I have not studied the various theories, nor speculated on whether God could have or would have flooded the earth. I believe He could and would if He wanted to. The Bible says he did. I am sure there are more learned persons who disagree with the Bible and with me.
As for Jerusha’s claim that the Catholic Church excommunicates in private, I don’t know anything about how the RCC goes about excommunicating.
The LDS Church also excommunicates in private. The court is held in the Bishop’s office with his two counselors present. The accused is there of his own free will, and presents his case in his own words, the Bishop takes everything under consideration, and after considering the facts of each case on an individual basis consults with the Prophet and his counselors, before issuing a decree of excommunication. The person and the bishopric are the only ones who know unless, as in the case of the Australian being discussed he wants it to be spread worldwide. It was his choice to let it be known.
Excommunication is the first step in repentance if the person wants to come back to the Church. He may go through the steps of repentance and be rebaptized at a later date.
BJ