J
JOHNYJ
Guest
Hell Yes !
Your observation and take is right on.Thanks to the blessings of Christ., the catholic understanding of sex has remained the same.
It is only the surrounding culture that has become obsessed with sex. You only have to surf the chanels to realize that our culture has gone nuts about it.
The more obsessed the world becomes with immoral acts the more it will view the church as repressed.
As Catholics we strive to fill our minds with what the spirit wants and not what human nature wants. Human nature only leads to death
Read some more of cynic’s posts and you’ll realize that she doesn’t acknowledge the sacramental meaning (both procreative and unitive) in each and every conjugal act of intercourse, i.e., it is acceptable to contracept the marital act; does not believe that the Church’s teaching on contraception is infallible; does not ascribe to the notion of absolutes in determination of morality. Point being: Good to qualify the source that is offering critique of what it means to embrace the " ‘unitive’ side of it."Read some more of kev7’s posts and you’ll realize that he doesn’t acknowledge any ‘unitive’ side of it.
Human nature only leads to death
Fallen human nature (which we all have) as the result of original sin can only lead to death. Otherwise, why else would we be in need of a savior and the redemption of our bodies?I disagree, Kev.
That is very cynical.
God started it! Blame Him!![]()
Thats too bad you say that. Perhaps you should read this.I disagree, Kev.
That is very cynical.
Catholics involved in a true Sacramental marriage have a very healthy attitude towards sex because it is recognized as one of God’s greatest gifts for their enjoyment and pleasure.
Scott Hahn PHd says that God’s love is so powerful in this Sacrament that in 9 months you may have to give it a name!
It is not only physical but emotional and spiritiual for us. It’s NOT just a bodily function it consumes the entire being.
What a great gift!
Blessings,
Joanie
The “Good News” New testament (todays english version) I have was given to me by the pastor of my church when I was only 6 years old. It has my name on it, and as long as it doesn’t get destroyed it wil lbe the only bible that I ever plan to have and read from. In my mind this is the version that God wanted me to have and I plan to keep it that way.Kev, the Bible translation you’re reading did not do well when they translated sarx as “human nature.” . The New American Bible, and the Revised Standard Bible, Catholic Edition, both have “flesh” instead of “human nature,” as do most other versions. (KJV, NKJV, NASB, NASB 1977, YLT - I’ve got Bible software) The NIV has “sinful nature,” a much better paraphrase than “human nature.” Even one of the “modern language” paraphrases, “God’s Word,” has “corrupt nature,” allowing for part of our nature to not be corrupt.
Specifically applied to Rom. 8:3, Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words says sarx (the greek) means “the weaker element in human nature”.
Human nature certainly includes fleshly desires. But it also includes the desire for God. Human nature is not completely sinful.
Here is what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says regarding your clarification:Kev, the Bible translation you’re reading did not do well when they translated sarx as “human nature.” . The New American Bible, and the Revised Standard Bible, Catholic Edition, both have “flesh” instead of “human nature,” as do most other versions. (KJV, NKJV, NASB, NASB 1977, YLT - I’ve got Bible software) The NIV has “sinful nature,” a much better paraphrase than “human nature.” Even one of the “modern language” paraphrases, “God’s Word,” has “corrupt nature,” allowing for part of our nature to not be corrupt.
Specifically applied to Rom. 8:3, Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words says sarx (the greek) means “the weaker element in human nature”.
Human nature certainly includes fleshly desires. But it also includes the desire for God. Human nature is not completely sinful.