Do Eastern catholics believe in papal infallibility?

[Genesis315]

Taking the question to its most primative form, without taking into account the doctrinal developments of how the infallibility of the Church as a whole is exercised by certain segments of the Church, would be this:

Do Eastern Catholics believe that the Pope can make a definitive binding doctrinal judgment for the whole Church? Or, in another form, can the Pope condemn a error or heresy for the whole Church? Or can every man judge for himself such decisions?

Or even more basic, does the Pope have the primacy in teaching as well a in government?

At least from the Eastern Catholics I have spoken to it seems the answer to those questions is yes, such judgments do have a binding nature.

 

[Episkope]

If you are referring to the 22 (I think) eastern rite churches that are in full communion with Rome then yes they do accept Papal Supremacy. If however you are referring to those churches commonly referred to as the Orthodox Church (e.g., Greek, Russian, etc.) they do not.

Of course when one reads the Dogma which unless I am mistaken says:

“That the Pope has a legal binding primacy of jurisdiction over every single national church and every individual Christian. The pope possesses the gift of Infallibility and his own solemn magisterial Decisions. These solemn (ex cathedra) decisions are Infallible on the basis or special support from all the Holy Spirit and are immutable (irreformable), intrinsically, not by virtue of the ascent of the Church."

And of course the statement that is included afterwards,

“Hence if anyone, which God forbid, should dare willfully to deny or to call into doubt that which we have defined, let him know that he has fallen away completely from the divine and Catholic Faith.”

One would have to assume that to be in communion with the Roman Church one would have to accept and believe the dogma of Infallibility.