B
BlackFriar
Guest
This view has been superseded for a number of reasons I believe:That doesn’t mean for certain that the rational soul is present, but since humans are soul-body composites by nature, it is sensible to err on the side of caution as guanophore notes.
(a) the delayed hominization view is starting to get new life amongst theologians. It is simplistic to assume Aquinas was wrong because he didn’t have good embryological knowledge. His view did not rest on the details of conception and fetal development. All that has happened is, as you say, the 40 days based on movement alone is too simplistic to define when the organs of sensibility and rationality have rudimentarily formed. Now it seems a matter of only 14 days which makes the discussion almost moot and now purely speculative.
(b) Baptism is no longer considered necessary to save souls from damnation. God is not, and never has, been limited to the Sacrament of water baptism. People can be saved regardless…certainly if there was no fault for Catholic parents not being able to baptise.
There is no great danger for which we need to err on the side of caution. Though if parents are distraught then obviously it is pastorally helpful to do so all the same as it personalises the situation and brings comfort and hope when their is irrational despair.
Last edited: