Do Pro-Lifers give misinformation about Margaret Sanger

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Sinner
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It doesn’t t debunk anything.

It basically says, “yes MS did all these things, but she had a good reason, therefore she isn’t really a racist. she is just a product of her time and place. She had noble reasons, and was trying to achieve something bigger than herself and that makes it all OK. All the people she worked with and aligned with to achieve her noble purpose-- they are the real racists.”

As for her writings, you can read those for yourself through the library.
 
Yes- she was an extreme racist. Pure and simple. Like Hitler. But possibly worse, since she promoted murder of the most helpless and innocent of all- the unborn.
 
According to that article, I’m an anti-choice fanatic, utterly incapable of making an honest argument in support of my position that Black women should be forced into childbirth rather than permitted to make their own decisions about what to do with their bodies,

Yup, that’s me. I tend to think that the child in question has a say in what should be done to his or her body. Once the baby exists, he’s a live person and should not be chopped up or salted to death.

Dr King’s daughter, Rev. Berenice King, is another of those fanatics, as was Dr Martin Luther King. I’m in good company.

.
 
The article you cited Ben Sinner paints Sanger as quasi pro-life.

That was non-sense and should not have been printed.

Their own quote that they use only has Sanger not advocating using abortion for mere birth control or as she says, (emphasis mine) . . . .

. . . . “the practice of it (abortion) merely for limitation of offspring is dangerous and vicious.”

Then the article tries to bamboozle the reader that Sanger is against abortion.

The article opines: “Sanger opposed abortion. She believed it to be a barbaric practice.”

This is utter non-sense.

There is a LOT of pro-abort people today that would agree that abortion should not be used for birth control but are still rabidly pro-abortion.

All the quotes the article reviewed the “context” of, just re-affirms what everyone already knows about Sanger’s agenda of population control and hate.

The fact that some of the black people Sanger duped are OK with killing black babies is irrelevant.

Check out the following links (below) and see what YOU think.

Don’t trust the pro-abortion propagandists. These people worry more about manipulation of public opinion than truth.

The world view of these pro-abortion people is they think it is OK to murder an innocent human being.

There is subsequently many things these pro-abortion people then need to do for their own “conscience salve” because they know deep down inside this practice of killing innocent humans is an utter abomination (“well we will get better social programs. You need to weigh it all in the balance” all while they de-humanize the pre-born human).

Check these Google-cached links out below and draw your own conclusions and do not expect people willing to murder the innocent to try to give you truth.

God bless.

Cathoholic

prof77.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/022e8fba31be904953f613534d22af88.jpg?w=500

2.bp.blogspot.com/-Pmdgx6raD2U/VehZ2FfrXfI/AAAAAAAALHc/1qY8ajQpG4g/s1600/PermitMRC.jpg

s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/20/ac/90/20ac90ef340a8129fcac489709960344.jpg

google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redditmedia.com%2FtLUZy-ydItnEoTldAmpWastVTH1fFEA2QW4PBETIaHs.jpg%3Fw%3D236%26s%3Dd988b6267a2ea351062c15163f998f69&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FThe_Donald%2Fcomments%2F4iaq3b%2Fno_wonder_hillary_likes_robert_byrd%2F&docid=lco7aXuH0OIExM&tbnid=aD8NsZu-s3dMRM%3A&vet=1&w=236&h=215&bih=588&biw=1003&ved=0ahUKEwjqqOrT0J3QAhUE1oMKHceoCggQMwgoKAswCw&iact=mrc&uact=8

i0.wp.com/moralmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/MargaretSangerQuoteRe.SegmentsOfPopulationmargaret-sanger-jewslatinos-human-weeds.jpg

s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/94/75/85/947585050fa44bc9a0bc2fa927e73062.jpg
 
Why is it “hate-speech” if you disagree with someone?

Why is it “hate-speech” if you read aloud what someone actually wrote?
 
I think that sanger and hitler admired each other. Hitler may have gotten some of his ideas from her.

She hated blacks, the disabled and the poor. She absolutely hated large families. She promoted sterilizing those she saw as unfit to reproduce.

Why are most planned parenthoods located in poorer minority areas? Hint: its not to provide pap smears!
 
Only if it’s misinformation to directly quote her own writings…
 
Qoeleth said:
Yes- she was an extreme racist. Pure and simple. Like Hitler. But possibly worse, since she promoted murder of the most helpless and innocent of all- the unborn.
Click to expand...
She was a Eugenicist, and her ideas were into practice by AH.
 
Sanger’s disdain for certain groups, such as Latins (by this I think she means “Latin Americans” not Italians, though, If I recall correctly, she was not too fond of them either), Catholics, Blacks, Jews, and many others is well documented. Even by many “pro-choice” individuals. Yes, she was a product of her time. That doesn’t make her views excusable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top