L
Lorrie
Guest
I voted yes. I’ve noticed that most people do it (make the sign of the cross after communion) at my parish.
Ever notice that around here one man’s pious practice is another man’s liturgical abuse?If there is no documentation requiring one to cross oneself, I would assume it’s simply a pious practice.
While I do hope what comes out of most of the pulpits in your diocese is sound instruction, that is not always the case. Just last weekend I was asking a priest to please include the Creed in the liturgy and he misrepresented certain guidelines of the GIRM while being flat out wrong on another. So a Catholic *shouldn’t *need documentation, but often does.why should a faithful Catholic in the pews require documentation for something that is announced and taught from the pulpit in most of the parishes in the diocese?
me too.I was never taught to cross myself immediately after receiving. I do cross myself when I get back to the pew and kneel down to pray and again when I am done praying. Our congregation seems split on whether they cross themselves immediately after or not. I have watched from time to time and it seemed the nuns didn’t and neither do most of the older people. I assumed they knew better than me so I continue in the practice mentioned above.