L
LittleSoldier
Guest
I saw that debate. It was on “Intelligence Squared” and featured Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry against Archbishop Onaiyekan of Nigeria and Anne Widdecombe.
The debate really wasn’t fair: Hitchens and Fry are skilled speakers and entertainers who know how to “work a crowd”. The good Archbishop did not have full command of the English language and Ms. Widdecombe, while energetic, is a lay person and had an irritating manner of speech. Basically, it was a trap and the Archbishop and Widdecombe took the bait.
None of the proceedings should cause one to believe that The Catholic Church is NOT a force for good. Hitchens and Fry had their list of typical “church evils” (I’m not denying the evil or sins) from 2000 years of history and had fun entertaining the audience with that list. The Archbishop wasn’t skillful at speaking English and didn’t really debate as such and Ms. Widdecombe’s manner was so irritating that it just about made no difference what she said as far as the audience was concerned.
In the end, The Deceived audience was Deceived by Deceivers while the Truth was left behind mocked and laughed at. The BBC should be ashamed for making such a presentation. It was a tremendous disservice to the public and nothing intelligent was really discussed.
Perhaps the debate should have been: “Is secular society a force for Evil in the world?”. Hitchens and Fry might not be so adept at denying that.