C
catholic1seeks
Guest
I’m confused.
I have long understood hell to be self-inflicted; that the the individual “chooses” hell; that the doors to hell are “locked from the inside”; and so the chief punishment of hell is separation from God.
The modern Catholic philosopher Edward Feser says that this view is only partially correct. He goes on to say:
Hell only makes sense to me if its punishment is inherent to the nature of hell – or to the nature of sin, etc. In other words, I don’t understand how God should positively *punish *those in hell. It seems very human.
I have a hard enough time understanding hell as an unending state/place of torment. But with this additional element of God’s active punishment… it is even more difficult to swallow.
Any help would be appreciated.
I have long understood hell to be self-inflicted; that the the individual “chooses” hell; that the doors to hell are “locked from the inside”; and so the chief punishment of hell is separation from God.
The modern Catholic philosopher Edward Feser says that this view is only partially correct. He goes on to say:
So, for Aquinas, it’s not just that the damned, due to the fixity of their wills after death (as described in my previous post on this subject) perpetually choose something less than God and thus perpetually miss out on what would make them happy. It’s that they also suffer additional positive harms in addition to this loss, and that God ensures that this will happen.
This may sound hard to reconcile with God’s goodness. But in fact, on the Thomistic account it follows from God’s goodness. For inflicting on an unrepentant evildoer a punishment proportionate to his offense is a good thing, and the damned are precisely those who forever keep doing evil and refuse to repent, and thus merit perpetual punishment. Hence God, in his goodness, inflicts that punishment.
Now Aquinas, as huge as he is, is not infallible. Still, I cannot help but think this idea of hell as God’s punishment has found itself in traditional understandings of hell. There is that whole “pain of sense” people talk about when describing the alleged physical fires of hell, for example.
Hell only makes sense to me if its punishment is inherent to the nature of hell – or to the nature of sin, etc. In other words, I don’t understand how God should positively *punish *those in hell. It seems very human.
I have a hard enough time understanding hell as an unending state/place of torment. But with this additional element of God’s active punishment… it is even more difficult to swallow.
Any help would be appreciated.