B
Bahman
Guest
- God has omniscience
- God stated that creation is good
- Creation has to stay good unless (1) or (2) is wrong
- No one can perform evil action because of (3)
- Evil action exist hence (1) or (2) is wrong
The word “good” in this statement is really vague. I might call a piece of artwork good, even if it has flaws. The flaws might even enhance my opinion of the work. It all depends on my subjective views.
- God has omniscience
- God stated that creation is good
- Creation has to stay good unless (1) or (2) is wrong
- No one can perform evil action because of (3)
- Evil action exist hence (1) or (2) is wrong
If 3 is wrong, it doesn’t follow that 1 and 2 are wrong.
- God has omniscience
- God stated that creation is good
- Creation has to stay good unless (1) or (2) is wrong
- No one can perform evil action because of (3)
- Evil action exist hence (1) or (2) is wrong
I would submit that the term “stay good” does not really cohere with what classical theists would define “good” to be. Someone committed, say, to the convertibility of being and goodness would not accept that something could not “stay good.” Substances are always good to some extent; evil is parasitic upon goodness. The person who commits a crime has made himself worse thereby, but he is still good, and his badness is purely a consequence of his failing to be perfect.
- Creation has to stay good unless (1) or (2) is wrong
- No one can perform evil action because of (3)