W
warpspeedpetey
Guest
it has come to my attention in various conversations that the accepted big bang theory proves the existence of an infinity prior to the expansion.
here is why.
the mathematical regression from the observable universe back to the big bang posits a ‘moment’ (for lack of a better word) when no physical laws and no time existed. it also posits a singularity from which the universe expanded.
that singularity is an assumption that explains from ‘what’ the universe expanded, it is not actually mathematically possible to show that the singularity existed, the math does not extend past the ‘moment’ in which no time or physical laws existed
with no singularity the theory reduces to a mathematical proof of an infinity prior to and outside of the observable universe
further that infinity in which no time or space exists is, by the nature of an infinity, self existent, as bacon said, should one infinity exist it would preclude all others.
proof, i believe, of an existent First Cause that is infinite in its nature.
just as we have always claimed G-d to be.
here is why.
the mathematical regression from the observable universe back to the big bang posits a ‘moment’ (for lack of a better word) when no physical laws and no time existed. it also posits a singularity from which the universe expanded.
that singularity is an assumption that explains from ‘what’ the universe expanded, it is not actually mathematically possible to show that the singularity existed, the math does not extend past the ‘moment’ in which no time or physical laws existed
with no singularity the theory reduces to a mathematical proof of an infinity prior to and outside of the observable universe
further that infinity in which no time or space exists is, by the nature of an infinity, self existent, as bacon said, should one infinity exist it would preclude all others.
proof, i believe, of an existent First Cause that is infinite in its nature.
just as we have always claimed G-d to be.