B
babylonfalling
Guest
We know that faith without works is dead but if a faith is dead, there is in implication that it was once alive. I don’t believe James was talking about dead in the sense of a stone or a butter knife or anything else that was never alive. We don’t use the word dead that way and I don’t think James was using it that way either. When we say something is dead, it’s normally something that used to be alive.
That would mean a faith which is now dead because of zero works was once alive despite zero works. If that’s the case, then for a period of time, we have a case of living faith with zero works. From that perspective, works appears to be something which sustains a faith that initially started out with no works at all. Works becomes a type of fuel which (among other things) keeps the faith from dying. Works are still necessary but the first burst of living faith can occur without works.
That would mean a faith which is now dead because of zero works was once alive despite zero works. If that’s the case, then for a period of time, we have a case of living faith with zero works. From that perspective, works appears to be something which sustains a faith that initially started out with no works at all. Works becomes a type of fuel which (among other things) keeps the faith from dying. Works are still necessary but the first burst of living faith can occur without works.