Dogma is the Church Traditions (with a capital “T”). These are taught by the Magesterium and are basically unchangeable. By “basically”, I mean the Magesterium can expand on a Dogma (I think the Immaculate Conception is a case in point), but it can not contradict any Dogma. For instance, we can’t just get rid of that whole “Real Presence” thing now can we?
The Magesterium also helps to further reveal some of the mysteries in the Church and the Bible. For instance, the Holy Trinity was not understood as we’ve come to know it, for several centuries after the formation of the Church. By living Magesterium, are you talking about traditions (with a little “t”)? These are disciplines that can change for various reasons. I think that the celibacy of priests is a tradition, as opposed to a Dogma. Contrary to what the media thought during the election of the Pope, I’m pretty sure the ban on ordaining an openly gay priest is a Dogma, and besides, I’m pretty sure Hell hasn’t frozen over, yet!!!
By opposing Church Dogma, you are heading down a slippery slope, my friend. As Catholics we believe that Jesus formed His Church and gave them the Authority to teach Church Dogma Infallibly. So, by opposing these Dogmas, you oppose the Authority given by Jesus, then you oppose the Church’s Infallibility, then you oppose … I’ve heard this story before, somewhere. Oh yeah, that whole Reformation Thing!
Do you see my point?
Good Luck, my friend.
NotWorthy
