Dogs Allowed in Church for a Wedding???

  • Thread starter Thread starter idrum677
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Although, I personally wouldn’t bring a pet into a church just because I’d be concerned about people who might allergic to animal hair/dander or might just actually have a fear of certain animals, along with dealing with animal doo-doo, I don’t know of any rule saying animals can’t be in a church.
You can make the same argument about incense in church. Some people are highly allergic.

I just feel that a couple should be about to have a personal touch at their own wedding, within reason. Sometimes I feel the Church has too many regulations and should loosen up a bit about stuff like this.
 
You can make the same argument about incense in church. Some people are highly allergic.

I just feel that a couple should be about to have a personal touch at their own wedding, within reason. Sometimes I feel the Church has too many regulations and should loosen up a bit about stuff like this.
Marriage is a Sacrament that belongs to the Church. The Church is guardian of the sacraments.

Marriage is about a statement of promises, said in the witness of humans. Yes, humans. If you understand liturgy at all, you understand that everything in a liturgy has a theological purpose of some kind. This is that humans are made in God’s image of the trinity, and everything stemming from that. Animals don’t have a role in that focus.

Much of the problem with marriage today stems from the overdoing of the “wedding day” schmaltzie stuff rather than focusing on the sacrament. Who says there should be a “personal touch?”

The church is actually quite tolerant and loose regarding some aspects of weddings.
 
Well, just putting this in: a couple in my area wanted their dogs to be at the wedding, and all of the churches turned them away. So, they got married at the adoration chapel at my school.

-Jeanne
 
So what if they want their dogs there too. I think you’re too uptight. I’m sure they’ll have their human witnesses. Just because a dog is there too doesn’t make it less of a sacrament.
 
So what if they want their dogs there too. I think you’re too uptight. I’m sure they’ll have their human witnesses. Just because a dog is there too doesn’t make it less of a sacrament.
Keep your opinions about what you think about “me” to yourself.

This isn’t ME we are talking about, this is the church. There are reasons for this, as I just explained. EVERYTHING in the mass has theological purposes. This isn’t a matter of bring “uptight” this is a matter of having a purpose.

A wedding isn’t just a party people are throwing to honor themselves. It is a sacrament set inside a liturgy (usually a Mass-the Holy sacrifice).

Yes, having pets there does make it “less” of a sacrament because it has no purpose in the liturgical or theological life. Its making the marriage sacrament reduced to a party or some chincy show rather than the icon of the marriage of Christ to his church.
 
In my opinion? What?

Do you not understand anything about how the church works? I am not stating my opinion. This is Not merely my opinion. This is church teaching. Try reading the catechism.
 
You can make the same argument about incense in church. Some people are highly allergic.

I just feel that a couple should be about to have a personal touch at their own wedding, within reason. Sometimes I feel the Church has too many regulations and should loosen up a bit about stuff like this.
I wasn’t trying to make an argument, I was just saying why I wouldn’t personally do it. My mother has very bad asthma and is allergic to certain animal danders and hair as well as perfumes - although surprisingly not to incense. My husband has severe reactions to cat dander and my little cousin’s eyes turn red and swell shut when he’s around animal hair. I was thinking of them when I said that.

That said, incense has been used for worship for centuries - even before Christianity. Bringing pets to mass, on the other hand, has nothing to do with worship, nor does it have anything to do with the Sacrament of marriage. I’ve seen people bring their pets into mass for those animal blessings and I don’t have a problem with that. I don’t even really care if the priest allowed this couple to bring their pets to mass. It was up to the pastor to allow it and those dogs were probably looked after, well-trained, well-behaved and didn’t interfere with the mass.

But Agapewolf is right on with what she said. Both she and I have to deal with wedding couples all the time, since we’re musicians and assist in planning the liturgies with them. The marriage to some of these couples is not about the Sacrament and the years of marriage that follow. It’s about what they can do to “wow” their guests and themselves or how they can make their wedding “different” from everyone else. Outside of the mass, that’s great. They can do whatever they want to their heart’s desire to make their wedding different. But in terms of making their wedding “unique” for mass, there are limits, which are definitely needed.

If bringing the animals into the church is just about “making a statement” (this bride comment is heard all the time in one form or another by anyone who works with weddings) or to make a personal touch to their wedding which has nothing to do with the Sacrament, then it really doesn’t belong although I wouldn’t call it sinful or anything like that. In regards to the couple bringing their pets for the wedding - I doubt it was to wow anyone. They probably just love their pets and wanted them there. And their priest was kind enough to allow them in, but he would have had every right to say no to it.

A wedding couple just has one hour for the Sacrament and 23 hours (or at least a 4-6 hour reception) to “make a statement” or add a secular personal touch to their wedding day. To me, if a Catholic couple knows what is permitted and what the Sacrament of Matrimony is all about on the day of their marriage, why not save that 1 hour just for God and them. They have the rest of the day to focus on themselves and all the secular festivities of the occasion.
 
I think it is ridiculous to even consider having your pets present at a wedding, but there is a church I have visited in a neighboring diocese where the priest has a lovely Shetland Sheepdog who sits under his chair at Mass.

The dog is very well behaved and after a while, I didn’t even realize he was there. Still, it was very surprising to see.
 
Psalm 84:3

"For the sparrow hath found herself a house, and the turtle a nest for herself where she may lay her young ones: Thy altars, O Lord of hosts, my king and my God. "

If God in the OT didn’t mind sparrows nesting at His altar (and why would He mind ANY of His creatures being in His house?) then surely a pooch at a wedding, or blessing of pets in a church, should not cause such comment.
 
I don’t know of any rule against having a pet at the wedding, so it isn’t even a matter of “the Church should loosen up”, so much as “its unusual, maybe a little strange, but it doesn’t violate any rules”
 
First of all I have a small Dog that we were just informed he has terminal cancer. My fiance’ and I are both Catholic and are planning on being wed in October. We also planned to have our beloved pet be the ring bearer dressed in a Tuxedo carrying the rings up the Aisle on a leash to me and then exiting the church. When I asked the Priest of this he defiantly said NO! I asked him why? He stated that the dog has no soul like a person does and it isn’t permitted. I replied that the dog has touched more people’s souls and feelings than a lot of people I know. The priest stood his ground and stated that the “church was not a Circus, or a side show and that it was all about receiving the sacrament and that only humans were allowed in a church building or attending/participating in a Catholic wedding rather in or outside a church”. So I asked if this was biblical and he said the church follows the teachings of the bible. I said so if thats the case are Homo-Sexuals allowed in the Church? The priest replied yes they are human and are not responsible for their affliction. I said really!, then why would God destroy a city because of unclean acts and denounce such in his word? But yet these people are allowed in his sanctuary correct? Further more in the Bible does it mention any Beast that were present when The Son Of God was born in a Manger? How much Holy can a place be when the Son of our Living God is Born? And of all places a Stable full of Beasts! While i respect the reasoning behind the rules, I think if the wedding was to be handled Outdoors by a priest at a reception Center the couple was paying for, then pets should be allowed in the ceremony, especially if they are trained like ours is. And the fact he has a terminal affliction like Cancer! I know what some of you are going to say, but No I am NOT a Kook from California, I just happen to have a pet that is part of our family and doesn’t know he is a dog, and doesn’t smell or act like one as well.
 
People used to bring dogs to church in winter to keep their feet warm.

It’s a bit silly, but I would say in the great scheme of things, not a huge deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top