Dominate me (no this is not Latin or anything dirty)

[workinprogress]

Wome don’t like the Bible verses relating to man being the head of them. They seem to think guys who take it literally (because there is no evidence anything else was intended by God or that it’s patriarchy infiltration of sacred scripture) want to have to control the outlet of their wife’s passions. I think guys would rather do other things but they do have that mandate. Women might not think men understand how it feels or how it sounds to be subservient in any way to a member of the other sex despite all that equality (which is a misunderstood and misused meaning of the word). I don’t know about most of you but, as a boy, I was raised by my mom while dad went to work. I was subservient to a woman. I did not choose it but, you know, it was good for us. Actually, in a culture where women can hold a job that supports them and can get the education to help them get it, they have a choice if they want to live Biblically, marry or don’t marry, but marry a man who does not ride off Biblical teachings as legalism that contradict the teachings of mankind. It’s good for humility and the soul.
That gets me to my point. I would not have a future wife be the head of the household, but I would like to be subject to someone and my passions with it. I stay up to late, my room is messy, and I have other undisciplines that could use subjugating. It would be healthy for my soul, I think. If only I could have what couples who live Biblically in that way have. I may have a slight disability that disqualifies me from military service but I could become a religious. Nevertheless, I do have a boss. I do admit to sneaking a drink of pop during working time. I probably would be a better person if the boss kept a shorter leash on me because it does not do me well to think I can handle myself on my own. You know what else? She’s a woman and that doesn’t bother me (esp cause her kids are grown up.
I liked the new Benji movie (it was kind of nostalgic), but I can’t believe they have the mom saying how she could get a law degree but she has to stay home and take care of him. If he were not so caring of her feelings, he could be rightly been let down by that statement and even latently angry (it’s bad enough his dad is abusive). The drudgery of housework by the woman is Lenin’s idea. They are ideas that tear families apart. Children need their mothers; not tv or caregivers at daycare. This is common sense psychology. If at all possible, women need to take care of the kids at home. Theirs is a necessary job because they alone can do it right. Not even an effeminate man has the psychology to provide a child what a female mother can provide. We need you women to be at home and to have kids (lest we become like Japan and Europe) and raise them as good (hopefully Christian) citizens. God bless you for doing so! In doing so the women are great patriots because the level of stability/goodness of the family is reflected in society. One that goes rotten could eventually take out a neighborhood–especially in this age of materialism.

 

[RedHead_Sue]

work(name removed by moderator)rogress:

This is common sense psychology. If at all possible, women need to take care of the kids at home. Theirs is a necessary job because they alone can do it right. Not even an effeminate man has the psychology to provide a child what a female mother can provide.

There is no such thing as “common sense psychology.” Bother with the research and you will find that the majority psychological studies actually contradict common sense.

The rest of your post has no merit.

 

[workinprogress]

Where’s your proof? I remember articles about latch key kids. I also know that what is natural, works. If there are many Catholic schools not teaching right catechetics which has led to homeschooling by those who woke up to that fact, how do you suppose daycare or some stand-in parent with who knows what values will raise your kid, especially if you are a parent who either doesn’t care or doesn’t realize (but should if there’s any involvement by the parents in their childrens’ religious and spiritual ed) they are sending their kids to Heresy High?
I think your non-argument lacks merit and is probably very subjectively based in being a women. Even in lands with queens as top monarch, we’ve had men at the head of the household. An absolute monarch queen could end that at any time. Have you read “Ungodly Rage” by Donna Steichen? It’s scary where these feminist thoughts come from.