Enterence processional turning into a circus

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThePaladin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem is that different people like different things. At one of our Masses, we have a solemn procession with incense, cross and accompanying candles, our choir (traditional) altar servers, deacons and priest. The choir sing the entrance antiphon and continue while the altar is incensed. This sets a mood of anticipation in the congregation so that they are ready for the start of Mass. However, if we were to impose this ritual on one of our other Masses, I’m sure the congregation would regard it as a circus.
 
What Are you doing at the other mass?:confused: Then ideal procession is cross, candles deacon and priest lead by incense when used.
 
What Are you doing at the other mass?:confused: Then ideal procession is cross, candles deacon and priest lead by incense when used.
I think defining “the ideal procession” is what’s at issue in this thread. The GIRM mentions other people taking part in the procession including the reader and “other ministers” without defining who exactly these other ministers are (at least that I can see). Your procession leaves out the reader and the OP wants to leave out the other ministers. We should at least recognize that there’s room for interpretation.
 
Forgive me if I wasn’t clear; but the pastor was the one who originally suggested these changes.

Again; I apologize to the confusion.
If the pastor suggested it, than he should be the one to announce it and enforce it. Your wife can ask the cantors to be where they need to be to lead the entrance hymn, but she’s not in charge of the EMHC.

I suggest that she refer anyone with questions or complaints to the pastor. If he sticks to the new policy, than good. If he doesn’t, she needs to back down also.

Edited to add: I see that you say he doesn’t like conflict. But who does? It is still not your wife’s responsibility to fight this battle for him. She’s made the announcement, now she needs to simply refer people to the pastor.

Think of this, if the EMHCs continue to line up in the procession, how is she supposed to stop them? This is not really an issue of “liturgical abuse” and probably not the hill she wants to die on.
 
If we are going with the traditional definition of “ministers”, it would include acolytes, lectors, deacons, subdeacons (if there are any), (concelebrating) priests, and anyone “in choir” (which would include seminarians and above who don’t have an existing role for that Mass).

I have never heard of the cantor or anyone in the choir (as in back in the choir loft) processing in as they would already be busy with the introit.
 
I have to say that I’ve often seen the EMHCs enter in the procession but that that is usually when they sit in the sanctuary with the readers and altar servers; I haven’t usually seen it when they come from the assembly to exercise their ministry. From the GIRM I see nothing wrong with the practice. In my own parish, we only process the with the Cross bearer, candle bearers, the reader with the Book, and the priest. Unless of course we are having a baptism or wedding as written in the Rite in which case the parents, godparents, child(ren) or bride, groom & witnesses are also in the entrance procession.

I’ve been in your wife’s position at least once. A major decision was made that folks in our parish would no longer stand for the Offertory Procession (why they were doing it in the first place was unclear), no longer kneel during the EP (because someone convinced the Pastor that this was no longer done 🤷), and no more kneeling after the Agnus Dei. The Pastor instructed me to put the announcement in the first Parish Bulletin in the Fall.

Now, I was well aware that he avoided confrontation/controversy like the plague and I was also aware that the parish thought I was running the show – as secretary I often was blamed for things that other people had done but which I ended up being the one to announce. I quickly realized that the first bulletin of the fall coincided with his holidays and knew that if I did as instructed I would take the fall for this. I bluntly told my boss that if he wanted those changes to happen he would either have to announce them himself before he left for his holidays or it would wait until he came back home because otherwise I’d be blamed. He made the announcement before he left so the reminder did go in the first bulletin. Although I had absolutely nothing to do with it, I was still blamed.

We still don’t kneel for the consecration, 4 subsequent pastors have not seen fit to change that because they don’t think it’s important. What they don’t seem to realize is that there are people who were upset by the change initially are still upset by this change but feel they have no choice but to obey the pastor and would like nothing better than to be told to kneel.

We thought it was going to change with the new GIRM, in fact it was announced, but the Sunday before the First Sunday of Advent 2011, the priest who was with us temporarily announced that there would be no such change in our parish. We were without a pastor at the time and I think the bishop wanted to maintain the status quo until one was appointed. Unfortunately, the new pastor made clear to those who brought it up that he wasn’t going to change that. A handful of us still kneel for Consecration but I’m sure we’re viewed as disobedient.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top