T
tee_eff_em
Guest
I noticed the difference in Ephesians 5:22 between the Clementine Vulgate and the Nova vulgata, viz:
Douay-Rheims | Let women be subject to their husbands, as to the Lord:
Clementine Vulgate | Mulieres viris suis subditæ sint, sicut Domino:
Nova Vulgata | Mulieres viris suis sicut Domino,
For those without Latin, the explicit subjection/submission, which is present in every English translation I am familiar with, is missing from the *Nova Vulgata *-- I would render it in English “Wives, [be] to your husbands as to the Lord”.
I know others have seen this, but I have not seen any explanation? Is there any reason from, perhaps, the Greek for this omission (I have no Greek)? Did political correctness creep into the Nova Vulgata? Something else?
tee
Douay-Rheims | Let women be subject to their husbands, as to the Lord:
Clementine Vulgate | Mulieres viris suis subditæ sint, sicut Domino:
Nova Vulgata | Mulieres viris suis sicut Domino,
For those without Latin, the explicit subjection/submission, which is present in every English translation I am familiar with, is missing from the *Nova Vulgata *-- I would render it in English “Wives, [be] to your husbands as to the Lord”.
I know others have seen this, but I have not seen any explanation? Is there any reason from, perhaps, the Greek for this omission (I have no Greek)? Did political correctness creep into the Nova Vulgata? Something else?
tee