Glory to Jesus Christ!
Just my thoughts…
Let’s face it, this is one of those culturally conditioned things that show up in the Universal church.
Either position is valid. If Eucharistic adoration works for us that is just great. I know it is gaining popularity among traditional Western Catholics again, but for some people it has no appeal at all. Saying this does not mean the person in any way would deny the Real Presence, one cannot therefore argue that we
should attend Eucharistic Adoration, forty hour devotions, etc. because of the Real presence, but one can say it is an acceptable and worthwhile devotion for those people who can appreciate the practice.
I have a friend, formerly Jewish (well actually she will always be Jewish!), who converted to Catholicism particularly because she sensed Christ in the Eucharist, and faithfully returns to parishes and monasteries for Eucharistic adoration, “quiet time” with the Lord, daily mass and contemplation.
Others I know just don’t have an appreciation for it, but it’s a cultural reaction, and not at all wrong.
Eastern Catholics do not have Eucharistic Adoration as a normal part of their spirituality. In the Eastern Catholic and Orthodox churches the Eucharist is a dynamic process, as such, displaying the Host in a Monstrance seems like keeping God in suspended animation. Of course we know better, God is beyond space and time, but that is a cultural reaction!
The difference can be analogious to eating. One can either eat, or look at it. Eastern Catholics will understand that the Eucharist is to be eaten, it is
in the partaking that we are communing with the Lord. Eucharistic Adoration from that perspective can be like “playing with your food” according to someone I know who explained it very nicely once.
This is not to disparage the practice, but Eastern Catholics who have not been latinized to any great degree just wouldn’t embrace the practice, and agree that it is a uniquely Western custom best left to the West.
Please consider one other point I never see raised in these discussions. Our culture informs our spirituality, and the Roman Catholic West does not exist in a monolithic, “one size fits all” cultural base.
We all know about the East-West (Greek-Roman) divergences, but that is not all, Northern Europeans would not have the same appreciation for some things as southern Europeans. Mediterranean culture and North Sea culture are different in a lot of ways. Throw in African culture, Indian culture and Chinese culture and we can see that there can be a lot of legitimately different approaches to the Universal Truth.
Church history is full of examples where a spiritual movement (the
Devotio Moderna for example) would be a regional phenomenon. That is probably one reason the Protestant movement was much more successful in northern Europe, the arguments and ideas were culturally informed.
So (for example) if Spain has a popular spiritual movement like
los Penitentes and it doesn’t catch on in Ireland or Finnland, we shouldn’t be surprised. Just a little conjecture here, but if a Protestant of northern European descent doesn’t have an appreciation for some tradtional Catholic practices, it is entirely possible that he/she wouldn’t have appreciated it anyway even if the Protestant reformation had never happened. There are many, many Catholics that do not participate in various devotions and yet fully understand and believe in the Real Presence and embrace the Magisterium of the church fully.
Thanks for listening.
