C
copland
Guest
I have not converted to Catholic Church YET because my wife is not ready for me to yet and she is not ready herself, but it is an event that will happen down the road. But for about a year and a half I have embraced Catholicism fully and my heart is there 110% now. I am waiting on God’s grace to touch my wife in this area to convert from Protestantism to the fulness of the faith.
But meanwhile I have studied hard about my faith in the Church, I had studied the Fathers, Catechism, Bible in the light of 2000 years of Tradition, etc. I have taught and preached in the Southern Baptist Church in the past, and I have always loved the Scriptures, and I have always loved to teach and spread the Word. But as most converts to Catholicism I have seen the weakness of the foundation of ‘Bible only’ and other Protestant traditions, and I have been full of zeal to show others the beauty and richness of the Cathoolic faith. I have never found evangelizing so assuring as I have now been sharing the faith through the eyes of the Catholic Church. Here are a couple of things I have noticed…
But meanwhile I have studied hard about my faith in the Church, I had studied the Fathers, Catechism, Bible in the light of 2000 years of Tradition, etc. I have taught and preached in the Southern Baptist Church in the past, and I have always loved the Scriptures, and I have always loved to teach and spread the Word. But as most converts to Catholicism I have seen the weakness of the foundation of ‘Bible only’ and other Protestant traditions, and I have been full of zeal to show others the beauty and richness of the Cathoolic faith. I have never found evangelizing so assuring as I have now been sharing the faith through the eyes of the Catholic Church. Here are a couple of things I have noticed…
- In the past I have had tough questions arise about why someone should put their faith in what the Bible says. As a Bible only protestant it is a little shaky because how can you proclaim the Bible as authoritative all by itself if you don’t believe in Church authority. In other words who had the authority to decide what books were canon/inspired, especially since there were many other wriitings circulating early on? But as a Catholic it is more logical that Jesus appointed His apostles to lead the Church, and they appointed successors who are the bishops who carried on their mission since the apostles eventually died. And the bishops appointed successors after them, etc etc etc. And these bishops carry on that teaching authority. And when you learn about the Fathers of the Church and are able to tell some things about them and their contribution to the Church and their continuity of apostolic succession, I have noticed that makes some honest truth seekers reevaluate their presuppositions about the authenticity of the Church. It gives life and history to the sacred Bible. It atleast makes more sense then some answers they get from many believers who seem to think that the Bible dropped out of the sky from Heaven one day.
- Another thing that is a benefit as a Catholic is that you no longer have to make excuses for all the divisions and thousands of denominations. As a Former Southern Baptist I know from experience that that is one of the main things that causes unbelievers to doubt Christianity, and even believers for that matter. Even among Southern Baptist they can’t even agree among themselves. The church I was at had a huge blend of people who were from various denominations who believed completely different on many important doctrines. Even the Sourthern Baptist Church across town was ordaining women deacons. But the Catholic Church is universial and on the same page. It is nice to no longer have to convince people that Jesus established such mass confusion of 40 thousand denominations, but He established “the Church.”