Everything that touches a consecrated host is consecrated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CatQuilt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CatQuilt

Guest
Is everything that touches a consecrated host supposed to be itself consecrated, i.e. the corporal, the paten, the ciborium, the priest’s hands?

Does that mean the EMHCs’ hands have also been consecrated?

Thanks!
 
Is everything that touches a consecrated host supposed to be itself consecrated, i.e. the corporal, the paten, the ciborium, the priest’s hands?

Does that mean the EMHCs’ hands have also been consecrated?

Thanks!
No, The Ciborium, Paten, Corporal are all now simply blessed, no longer consecrated. (I believe) An EMHC should be commissioned into the ministry, even temporarily, they too should receive a blessing before exercising the ministry.
 
Thank you Brother Rich for your prompt response.

This disturbs me. Doesn’t it seem like that was a Tradition (capital T)?

**“Out of reverence towards this sacrament, nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest’s hands, for touching this sacrament.” **
-ST. THOMAS AQUINAS, Summa Theologica

What changed between the time when St Thomas wrote that and whenever they switched to blessings?

That’s rhetorical question…just wondering out loud…

:o
 
I don’t really know how to answer this question correctly, but it seems to me that one would have to take two possible meanings from the word ‘Consecrated’. One cannot say that the ciborium, paten etc. are consecrated in the same sense that the bread and wine are - since in the case of bread and wine, consecration means that they become the Body and Blood of Christ. The other meaning for ‘Consecrated’ is that an object is blessed. A new church is consecrated, for example. So, I think in relation to objects which have touched the Host, maybe one should refer to them more as ‘Blessed’ in order to distinguish from what we normally understand by ‘Consecrated’ (ie:Bread & Wine). I know your question was rhetorical - but nothing really has changed on this question - there are at least two meanings for ‘Consecrated’, so I don’t think we are destructing a Tradition by reading St Thomas’ words in this way…

(Just an afterthought - as Thomas says, nothing touches the Sacrament but what is consecrated. So, relate that to you receiving Communion where you touch the Host - I think most people (receiving in a state of grace) would think of themselves as being blessed rather than consecrated!!)
 
I don’t really know how to answer this question correctly, but it seems to me that one would have to take two possible meanings from the word ‘Consecrated’. One cannot say that the ciborium, paten etc. are consecrated in the same sense that the bread and wine are - since in the case of bread and wine, consecration means that they become the Body and Blood of Christ. The other meaning for ‘Consecrated’ is that an object is blessed. A new church is consecrated, for example. So, I think in relation to objects which have touched the Host, maybe one should refer to them more as ‘Blessed’ in order to distinguish from what we normally understand by ‘Consecrated’ (ie:Bread & Wine). I know your question was rhetorical - but nothing really has changed on this question - there are at least two meanings for ‘Consecrated’, so I don’t think we are destructing a Tradition by reading St Thomas’ words in this way…

(Just an afterthought - as Thomas says, nothing touches the Sacrament but what is consecrated. So, relate that to you receiving Communion where you touch the Host - I think most people (receiving in a state of grace) would think of themselves as being blessed rather than consecrated!!)
Consecrated generally means that the object is Anointed with Sacred Chrism. Chalices, Ciboriums and Patens all were at one time anointed. A priests hands still are, as are altars, church buildings.
 
NPC raises an interesting question that hadn’t occurred to me previously; are there truly two different levels of blessing, or simply different names (and even ceremonies) for what is in its essence the same act?
 
Consecrated generally means that the object is Anointed with Sacred Chrism. Chalices, Ciboriums and Patens all were at one time anointed. A priests hands still are, as are altars, church buildings.
Indeed - my point being, of course, that the word ‘Consecrated’ evidently has multiple meanings, since the bread & wine are not annointed with Chrism to consecrate them! That is to say that ciboriums and chalices do not become consecrated in the same sense that the bread & wine when they touch the Body and Blood of Christ.
 
NPC raises an interesting question that hadn’t occurred to me previously; are there truly two different levels of blessing, or simply different names (and even ceremonies) for what is in its essence the same act?
I’m probably digging and digging a big hole for myself by discussing this topic further…! I don’t know about levels of blessing, and I certainly didn’t mean to imply this in my response. What I mean is that in certain instances Consecration can be translated as a blessing - of an altar, church, etc.- by prayers, holy water and chrism for example, as Br. Rich has said. The consecration which takes place at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is not a comparable blessing (it is so much more) since Christ becomes truly present under the appearence of bread and wine. I suppose, now you’ve got me thinking about this, there may well be levels of blessing depending on the purpose of the object being blessed - I don’t think there is as much ceremony involved in the blessing of a house as there would be for a new church… but I really don’t know!
 
I’m probably digging and digging a big hole for myself by discussing this topic further…! I don’t know about levels of blessing, and I certainly didn’t mean to imply this in my response. What I mean is that in certain instances Consecration can be translated as a blessing - of an altar, church, etc.- by prayers, holy water and chrism for example, as Br. Rich has said. The consecration which takes place at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is not a comparable blessing (it is so much more) since Christ becomes truly present under the appearence of bread and wine. I suppose, now you’ve got me thinking about this, there may well be levels of blessing depending on the purpose of the object being blessed - I don’t think there is as much ceremony involved in the blessing of a house as there would be for a new church… but I really don’t know!
As I said in other places the same word can be used in different ways. So with our language you have to be careful. If you look into the Early Christian writings. Some Fathers when speaking of the Eucharist speak of “The bread which we bless, becomes the Body of Christ”.
 
As I said in other places the same word can be used in different ways. So with our language you have to be careful. If you look into the Early Christian writings. Some Fathers when speaking of the Eucharist speak of “The bread which we bless, becomes the Body of Christ”.
So I’m still curious if you can shed light on my question, are there separate acts of blessing theologically (obviously consecration of the sacred species IS a separate category), or does Catholic teaching not really distinguish these acts, except that blessing of an altar or church may be more formal and involved than blessing a rosary? In other words, do we read of any “real” difference in Catholic teaching, or just ceremonial differences?
 
newadvent.org/cathen/04276a.htm
Consecration

The Church distinguishes consecration from blessing, both in regard to persons and to things. Hence the Roman Pontifical treats of the consecration of a bishop and of the blessing of an abbot, of the blessing of a corner-stone and the consecration of a church or altar. In both, the persons or things pass from a common, or profane, order to a new state, and become the subjects or the instruments of Divine protection. At a consecration the ceremonies are more solemn and elaborate than at a blessing. The ordinary minister of a consecration is a bishop, whilst the ordinary minister of a blessing is a priest. At every consecration the holy oils are used; at a blessing customarily on holy water. The new state to which consecration elevates persons or things is permanent, and the rite can never be repeated, which is not the case at a blessing; the graces attached to consecration are more numerous and efficacious than those attached to a blessing; the profanation of a consecrated person or thing carries with it a new species of sin, namely sacrilege, which the profanation of a blessed person or thing does not always do.

Of consecration proper the Roman Pontifical contains one of persons, that is of a bishop, and four of things, that is, of a fixed altar, of an altar-stone, of a church, and of a chalice and paten. The consecration of a church is also called its dedication (q.v.) in accordance with the distinction between consecration and dedication among the ancient Romans pointed out above. To these might be probably added confirmation and Holy orders, for which, however, the Roman Pontifical, because they are distinct sacraments, has retained their proper names. If we except the consecration of a bishop, which is a sacrament – although there is a question among theologians, whether the sacrament and the character imprinted by it are distinct from the sacrament and character of the priesthood, or only a certain extension of the sacerdotal sacrament and character – all the other consecrations are sacramentals. These are inanimate things which are not susceptible of Divine grace, but are a medium of its communication, since by their consecration they acquire a certain spiritual power by which they are rendered in perpetuum fit and suitable for Divine worship. (St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa theol., III:83:3, ad 3 and 4.)

In the Eastern Churches the prayers at the consecration of altars and sacred vessels are of the same import as those used in the Latin Church, and they are accompanied by the sign of the cross and the anointing with holy oils (Renaudot, “Liturgiarum Orient. Collectio”, I, Ad benedictiones). At the consecration of a bishop, the Orientals hold, with the Latins, that the essence consists in the laying-on of hands, and they entirely omit the anointing with holy oils (Morinus, De sacris Ecclesiæ ordinationibus, Pars III, Appendis).
 
The new state to which consecration elevates persons or things is permanent, and the rite can never be repeated
This seems contrary to my understanding of deconsecrating churches when they are to be sold. It also raises the question, is the consecration repeated if the Church buys back a property years after it was deconsecrated and sold?
 
So I’m still curious if you can shed light on my question, are there separate acts of blessing theologically (obviously consecration of the sacred species IS a separate category), or does Catholic teaching not really distinguish these acts, except that blessing of an altar or church may be more formal and involved than blessing a rosary? In other words, do we read of any “real” difference in Catholic teaching, or just ceremonial differences?
That is an impossible question to really answer. Is this Rosary blessed by Pope John Paul II more blessed than this other one blessed by Father Dave?
There are distinctions between Blessings. Solemn Blessings, Simple Blessings, Papal Blessings, Episcopal Blessings, etc. All with different Rites, Rituals, and Ceremonies. I’m going to guess that because there are different visible, physical actions and signs. “What we do, reflects what we believe.” That there are probably Spiritual differences as well. Notice that when the Pope celebrates Mass. At the Consecration he removes all head coverings. This symbolizes that he is at that point acting as a simple priest, not a pope, not a bishop, a simple priest. I believe that same is true when hearing Confessions. The Consecration at Mass by Pope Benedict is no different than the Consecration by Father Dave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top