EWTN

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bix
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bix

Guest
Sorry if this isn’t the proper forum for this…

I’m interested in knowing what fellow Catholics think about EWTN. Any replies or thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks ~
 
I love EWTN, It helps me to be proud as a catholic. I use it almost every day especially when I’m dry in purpose, faith or anything, and there they are, having something new for me, teaching me how to Love, care and imitate our Lord and our Loving Mother. Reminding me how Merciful the Lord is, to the whole world. They also give stories of Saints, People who were once here on Earth like me, and how they managed to Love Jesus so much, riding off themselves for all sinners and the lives in purgatory and loving Jesus so so much, that they wished they would have more than one heart, to pour to HIM. I thank My Lord for EWTN, for The Saints and Angels. So much to thank Him for. Encourage all to watch EWTN.
 
I love EWTN, It helps me to be proud as a catholic. I use it almost every day especially when I’m dry in purpose, faith or anything, and there they are, having something new for me, teaching me how to Love, care and imitate our Lord and our Loving Mother. Reminding me how Merciful the Lord is, to the whole world. They also give stories of Saints, People who were once here on Earth like me, and how they managed to Love Jesus so much, riding off themselves for all sinners and the lives in purgatory and loving Jesus so so much, that they wished they would have more than one heart, to pour to HIM. I thank My Lord for EWTN, for The Saints and Angels. So much to thank Him for. Encourage all to watch EWTN.
Thank you for responding 🙂
I copied and pasted my clarification as to asking this question.
Thanks Again

Sorry, I should have clarified. .

I greatly enjoy having access to EWTN and it was especially a blessing during the long period of time I was sick. The ability to have access to seeing Mass when you are not able to leave the home is really a gift- especially with the overwhelming number of Protestant churches on television. Their shows on faith, spiritual development and the lives of saints also taught me quite a bit as well as brought a great amount of peace.

My recent visits have been great. It’s such a peaceful environment and the few people I’ve briefly met while there are extremely kind and love to talk about their faith.

I heard from someone they were hiring for a few positions and while searching for key … Members and staff to see if I knew anyone- the majority of info which came up on my search was quite negative and I was surprised. I’ve been aware of a few things from times past which are exaggerated and some twisted to a different story slant, but many of these were surprisingly from Catholic priests and churches. I was curious as to others views here as most are quite open with their thoughts and opinions.

Thank you
God Bless~
 
Some of the programming is a little Pollyanna to me, which probably just means I am too great a sinner to get much from it. Like Women of Grace. Now, I am not saying it is bad or Catholicl-light…not at all. Its just that those ladies seem to all be stay at home moms with 15 homeschooled children and a radio show and books to boot. Ugh. And I feel like such a loser with my pitifully unfeminine life.

Well, enough of my pity party. Sorry about that!

I love the Mass on radio…good to listen to in the car.

I love Fr Mitch Paquwa.

I love, love, love Mother Angelica’s shows.

Sometimes they have a woman named Rosalind who is a Jewish convert…her understanding of Scripture and of Mary (a tough little Jewish girl) are eye opening.
 
Im not sure what you mean about the staff. Are you wanting to work there or just curious if these professional Catholics might also be human?
 
Im not sure what you mean about the staff. Are you wanting to work there or just curious if these professional Catholics might also be human?
Laughing , I’m sorry… 🙂 upon rereading my post, I can understand the confusion. It’s been a long time since I’ve posted regularlary under anything except prayer intentions and I’m not as concise as I should be… 😊

I’m interested in working there. Everyone I’ve seen or met does seem to be human as well 😃

After going by their gift shop a time or two, I’ve gone over there to sit outside and job search on my iPad since it seems I get distracted at home and it’s such a peaceful place. There’s a little bench where you can sit by yourself and watch the birds, squirrels, and …oh yeah, search the internet. You can see a large altar and crucifix from there as well as the chapel. It’s serene and safe and I’ve even had the opportunity to help an out of state visitor or two. I didn’t realize it was only about 20 minutes from home. Silly me, realized later they had a position or two open. However, I’m guessing it’s very difficult to even get your resume seen or noticed, much less hired there as the website states they recieve an extremely large number of resumes and requests… But, I can always dream 🙂
 
Well, I am glad to have given you a chuckle! At least I can be counted on for something! 😃

I guess I can’t answer your question, then, but hey I gave it my best shot! I’ll say a prayer or two for you to get the job, however, maybe that’s what you need!:o
 
If you do happen to get a job there, a lot of their programming sorely needs updated and perhaps not repeated so often. 😉

Seriously, I watch it much less than I used to, because they seem to deal with the same old topics over and over again, and the good programs seem to be on around 4 or 5 AM in this time zone. And I have almost nothing in common with some of the women’s programs. They seem like they are from another world, I don’t know anybody like them, or anybody that talks like them.🤷
 
If you do happen to get a job there, a lot of their programming sorely needs updated and perhaps not repeated so often. 😉

Seriously, I watch it much less than I used to, because they seem to deal with the same old topics over and over again, and the good programs seem to be on around 4 or 5 AM in this time zone.
 
If you do happen to get a job there, a lot of their programming sorely needs updated and perhaps not repeated so often. 😉

Seriously, I watch it much less than I used to, because they seem to deal with the same old topics over and over again, and the good programs seem to be on around 4 or 5 AM in this time zone. And I have almost nothing in common with some of the women’s programs. They seem like they are from another world, I don’t know anybody like them, or anybody that talks like them.:
Wow. Obviously you and I travel in very different circles, because I know many women who respect Johnette Benkovic immensely, I being one of them. “Nothing in common with them?” You mean, like, their fervor for the Faith, their orthodoxy, their spirituality, their practical sense? (Johnette has many practically-oriented women-of-the-world on the program, everything from people who specialize in OCD, psychologists who help repair marriages. women and men who work in all kinds of everyday occupations and everyday wisdom to offer, women who have had to confront alcoholism in their own lives, as well as husbands plagued by their attachment to internet porn. She addresses issues and guests with topics like parenting, gangs, and much else.) I wonder if Johnette is just too real for you, maybe?
 
More on women:

Colleen Caroll Campbell? She’s both a career woman (having worked in secular media as well as Catholic) and a wife & mother. I don’t find anything in her programs that “can’t be related to.”🤷
 
Dear Bix,

I will admit that I also watch selectively, but my general opinion of the station is that I am thankful it exists, whatever the checkered quality of programming sometimes is. (My children being no longer very young, the afternoon children’s shows have no value for me. Some of the “campus” programming I also have little use for. And some of the topics on Life on the Rock I find really repetitive.)

However, again, there is variety. Weekend programs include Catholic Culture, Benediction (love it) and rebroadcast programs that can’t always be seen during the week.

I love the EWTN roundtable hosted by Colin Donovan, my fave apologist ever.

People have to expect that with a less “glamorous” focus and budget, and the need to appeal to a wide variety of Catholics, not all programs will be equally accessible by all. Again, though, the fact that 24-hour Catholic programming is even available as a voice in an increasingly irreligious world is something I’m grateful for. The Daily Mass, particularly by some of the priests, is a blessing. And they were there for the entire papal election process. Also, their specialty programs for us culture lovers (music/art on Sunday mornings), and Joan’s Rome and the organ program (I forget its name) which visits various cathedrals, is also special.

They had a series that I also really appreciated: the Fulton J. Sheen one, hosted by Fr. Charles Connor, a historian, whose little snippets during the week on ecclesiastical history are sources of information. From time to time there is good catechesis, by way of series, and their Lenten homilies, both this year and last, have been fabulous. They have used overseas priests for some of these (from England and Ireland); homilies are thoughtful, very well prepared and sensitive.
 
Does anyone have an idea of what EWTN is worth? I read on Wikipedia that it has no owners or shareholders and is administered by trustees. Obviously an extremely valuable brand. I assume the network sees cash flows from the cable/satellite carriers, advertisements, gifts (both lifetime and testamentary), and retail sales.
 
Wow. Obviously you and I travel in very different circles, because I know many women who respect Johnette Benkovic immensely, I being one of them. “Nothing in common with them?” You mean, like, their fervor for the Faith, their orthodoxy, their spirituality, their practical sense? (Johnette has many practically-oriented women-of-the-world on the program, everything from people who specialize in OCD, psychologists who help repair marriages. women and men who work in all kinds of everyday occupations and everyday wisdom to offer, women who have had to confront alcoholism in their own lives, as well as husbands plagued by their attachment to internet porn. She addresses issues and guests with topics like parenting, gangs, and much else.) I wonder if Johnette is just too real for you, maybe?
There really is no reason for you to take me to task on my opinion, and your last comment is out of line. I just happen to see things differently than you do and have different preferences for programming, and I do not recall even mentioning Johnette Benkovic. We do travel in different circles–in my circle people express their opinions and disagree without getting snotty about it.

There is a way to cordially disagree, you know. Have a blessed day.
 
If you do happen to get a job there, a lot of their programming sorely needs updated and perhaps not repeated so often. 😉

Seriously, I watch it much less than I used to, because they seem to deal with the same old topics over and over again, and the good programs seem to be on around 4 or 5 AM in this time zone. And I have almost nothing in common with some of the women’s programs. They seem like they are from another world, I don’t know anybody like them, or anybody that talks like them.🤷
I actually agree with you about many of the women. If I were around them I would heel like a bull in a China shop. Or a dirty, muddy child who just knocked another kid down on the playground. Or a prostitute in high heels, garters and a tube top. You get the picture.

I feel those women might be what we ought to be, but that just makes me feel more alienated.

I wish Mary Magdalen and Dismas had a show. Maybe they’d invite me on as a guest!
 
There really is no reason for you to take me to task on my opinion, and your last comment is out of line. I just happen to see things differently than you do and have different preferences for programming, and I do not recall even mentioning Johnette Benkovic. We do travel in different circles–in my circle people express their opinions and disagree without getting snotty about it.

There is a way to cordially disagree, you know. Have a blessed day.
LOL, such a self-contradictory post. 😉

Previously you stated that the women on EWTN “are from another world” and you knew “no one like them.” I replied that at least one of the shows often shows some pretty raw realism, and I itemized some of that. And since some people might not have those experiences I listed, the remark about “too real” should have been taken at the face value that it was meant.

But yeah, I’m too logical for my own good. 😉 There were no malignant motives in my post.

My remarks were genuine in their disbelief, not because I cannot recognize that two different people can have VERY different preferences in programming, but because of your particular comments (and littlenothing’s recent comment as well) about “women’s shows” there. One of two things is possible:

(1) The episodes you and I (maybe others) have seen are very different episodes among women’s programming on EWTN. I don’t watch all of them, no question. It really is more a matter of happenstance. If I see it at the beginning of the week, and the topic (usually carried through throughout the week), I will watch the whole week, because I find the approach thoughtful, insightful, sensitive, and the guests to be the same, as well as realistic in terms of women’s lives.

It’s very possible that episodes I have not seen are not at all realistic about modern women’s lives, priorities, situations, and needs. That could explain that supposedly all of your friends and acquaintances have “absolutely nothing in common” with "women’s programs on EWTN (a category which includes realistic shows about women’s modern and very concrete lives), whereas my associates respond very differently to the collective “women’s shows” there.

(2) We have different understandings on what defines “a woman’s show.”

So maybe it would be best to define “women’s shows.” Women of Grace, hosted by Johnette Benkovic, while not exclusively about women, could certainly be classified as “a woman’s show,” and not just by title. Her other show, “The Abundant Life,” is not explicitly a “woman’s show,” even though Johnette brings her characteristic Catholic feminity to that show as well (which I believe most people, male and female, find attractive & refreshing). If she didn’t strike any authentic chords in women, I doubt very much that she would have the sustaining career that she has, which includes radio and speaking tours. Johnette is enormously popular, and it appears that although she is also popular among men, she is especially popular among Catholic women. It would be odd if she were able to achieve that status if most Catholic women “had nothing in common” with her.

Teresa Tomeo has a show. (Is it called “The Choices We Face?” I’m not sure.) In any case, I don’t watch it because I don’t care for her personality as much as Johnette’s. The former is not my style, and that’s why there’s vanilla and chocolate, and two people can react very differently to the same person.

I honestly can’t think of other “women’s shows.” Maybe I watch TV much less than some others here. What other “women’s shows” are there on EWTN, besides Johnette’s and possibly Teresa’s? (Since I don’t watch Teresa’s, I can’t verify that it’s a “woman’s show.”)

There are shows which are hosted by religious sisters, but I don’t think at all they’re “about” women. They’re about spirituality. Some are for adults, others for children.

Colleen Carroll Campbell’s show (again, a very modern, realistic, down-to-earth woman – someone every woman I know can relate to) is NOT “a woman’s show” exclusively or even primarily. She has an occasional woman on her show, but frankly most of the time she seems to have men. She’s comfortable around men; she used to work in the White House or something. Her show is on being a modern Catholic in contemporary culture.

In my opinion, none of the other shows hosted by women fit the category of “women’s shows” (as in, Chick Flick). They’re about travel, they’re about music, etc. but not “about women.” The theme of none of them is “women.”

So, you weren’t “even thinking about” Johnette. Then I am at a loss to understand which other “women’s shows” exist on EWTN. 🤷
 
I think EWTN has much to offer, and there’s much that’s inspiring, but we have to remember that it is not the final word on Catholicism and Church teaching at all times and in all instances. One has to be careful not to take it in wholesale, but be discerning.

It’s good also to read what the Catholic Church has to say, esp the Vatican (see and tour around vatican.va/ ), and understand EWTN may have some hidden agenda, perhaps due to some funding from some sources, or just from some non-Catholic cultural elements that sneak into our thinking.

I am very please with everything the Holy Fathers say, but concerned about a few of the things people on EWTN say.

I like Women of Grace, esp their program about hording; some of it doesn’t relate much to me, but others times it does; I think there was some weird week in which they got into some – I can’t remember, something like end-times or something that seemed weird and off. Except for that I like their programs.

What bugs me the most is the anti-environmental and anti-environmentalist comments in various EWTN programs (some amounting to slander) – in a daily Mass homily, in various commentaries, the Chesterton series, Life on the Rock (a nasty snark against Gore and the idea of climate change), and World Over hostings of Fr. Sirico of the Acton Institute – heavily funded by Exxon and Koch money, promoting climate change denialism and calling environmentalists neopagan pantheists. Fr. Pacwa, as well that the Chesterton team, have very meager understanding of environmental issues and accuse environmentalists as being earth-worshippers, missing the fact that we are harming and killing people and others of God’s creation through our environmental harms at the local, regional, and global levels. They socially misconstruct the environment as only wildlife in wilderness areas – cute, but not really worth saving, compared to people. ALL the environmentalists I know and myself understand we humans are causing the current global warming and many other problems, not an angry mother earth that needs propituating; we understand humans will be very greatly harmed by these problems on into the future, and we all are into science, not paganism. In fact, the few neo-pagans I’ve met over the past 30 years do not strike me as being strong environmentalists, not as strong as I or my environmentalist friends are.

Some of the programs go overboard into American teapartism, stressing “subsidiarity” (a good Catholic theme), but failing to balance that with “solidarity.” I’d suggest reading BXVI’s “Caritas in Veritate” and anything and everything he and JPII have written, instead of listening to what EWTN has to say about economic and environmental issues.

I had problems with their Fourth Rupture series on the environment, esp its denial of climate change, but also other things that really didn’t resonate much with me.

I also had problems with an anti-evolution program – its lambasting of people who accept the science of evolution; esp since the Church accepts evolution. Again, a back to the caveman’s era of non-science and anti-science…which could lead to anthropomorphic misconceptions of God as some David Copperfield on a white cloud wielding his magic finger…and perhaps back to paganism…

Aside from these problems, on the whole EWTN is pretty good. I love their Marian devotions and Masses. One just has to be careful not to be sucked into ideas and teachings (and unChristian modes of speech) that depart from Catholicism, and be very aware of our Catholic faith.

Because of the now and then comments, slander, and misconstrual of various issues, I don’t watch it often – afraid they’ll make some other errors that sling mud on our beautiful Church.

I’m sure most people here as CAF totally disagree with what I’ve written. They are perfectly free to read Church writings and see whether or not there are some flawed areas in EWTN.
 
One just has to be careful not to be sucked into ideas and teachings (and unChristian modes of speech) that depart from Catholicism, and be very aware of our Catholic faith.

Because of the now and then comments, slander, and misconstrual of various issues, I don’t watch it often – afraid they’ll make some other errors that sling mud on our beautiful Church.

I’m sure most people here as CAF totally disagree with what I’ve written. They are perfectly free to read Church writings and see whether or not there are some flawed areas in EWTN.
It’s not that I “totally disagree with what [you’ve] written.” It’s that I totally don’t understand it. What do you mean by “ideas and teachings that depart from Catholicism?” That is a very serious charge, and something that directly opposes the identity of the station. I think in order to be taken seriously you should come up with some specifics. I have never heard, on any of their theological programs (such as various catechetical series) any departure from Catholicism. Trained theologians host these, typically clergy, but sometimes degreed lay people as well. Ditto for their devotional series. Those are just recounting the practice of devotions, history of devotions, etc.

And what do you mean by “comments and slander slinging mud” at the Church? Again, that’s a very serious charge. To support that charge and be credible or even be listened to seriously, I think you need to provide examples of non-Catholic teachings presented and supported by the station.
 
I love EWTN. I love the way they say Mass. I especially like the tours of churches and the Vatican (I’ll never get there.) I like the Sunday music, the family prayer. What other media even mentions the persecutions of the Christians in the middle East? or Kermit Gosnell and abortion? I think it has good kids’ programming too - the Dominican sisters, the Donut Repair Club. EWTN is just about the only TV I watch.
 
It’s not that I “totally disagree with what [you’ve] written.” It’s that I totally don’t understand it. What do you mean by “ideas and teachings that depart from Catholicism?”…
As I mentioned, it is only on several occasions I have found troubling comments. The rest of EWTN is very good.

The problem is, those comments reflect the underlying mindset of the commentators.

It’s not that those EWTN folks directly oppose Church teaching. It’s more the slant and emphasis that goes against the spirit of Church teaching. It’s subtle, one needs to really look at papal writings. They tend to be moderate and measured, often including criticism of extremes on issues, but as caveats, not their main points.

What some on EWTN do is ignore the main points on the environment (or they misconstrue them), then heavily emphasize the caveats. Also the way they say things sometimes borders on slander; at least I feel insulted.

Here’s an analogy. If a pope were to write about parental neglect of children in the world, he might add a caveat that on the other hand parents should not dwell and dote on their children too much to the extent of becoming child-worshipers, ignoring God who created the child.

Likewise, when the holy fathers write about serious environmental problems that harm and kill people and how we need to do what we can to mitigate these problems, they sometimes add on as a caveat that we should not go to the extreme of valuing non-human creatures over humans, or worshiping the earth. But what I hear on EWTN is how environmentalists are neopagan earth-worshipers who care more for exotic species (that have no value or use to humans) than humans. Sometimes they add as caveat how we should be good stewards of God’s creation.

Now I realize EWTN folks don’t understand the very serious nature of environmental harms to human life or they might actually be talking about them more, giving people specific tips on how to mitigate these problems. I realize they misconstrue the environment as wild species in wilderness areas – cute, but expendable for human interests. I realize they don’t understand that the environment is also the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, the resources with which we make our products and build our buildings, the chemicals that permeate through our skin, and the climate in which our food production is viable. As modern people we have become somewhat detached from this knowledge and tend to think everything comes from the store, and not think beyond that. Plus the idea that our actions may be causing harm and death to others is unpleasant, even unacceptable to us.

Here are some anti-environmental comments on EWTN I happened to catch:
  • An EWTN priest during a homily made a slur against “ecologists” (I think he meant “enviornmentalists”)
  • some Chesterton episode had some mean-spirited caricatures of environmentalists (also showing that the host has no understanding of environmental problems)
  • the Life on the Rock host when commenting on a snow storm made a nasty slur against the favorate whipping boy of anti-environmentalists, Al Gore (unaware that global warming will bring more precipitation in bigger weather events, including blizzards, and cause more frequent strongly negative arctic oscillations or “nor-easters”)
  • Fr. Pawca interviewing the Chesterton host stressed the danger of environmentalists getting into earth-worshiping
  • Fr. Sirico on World Over did the same
  • Rome Reports did the same, and also featured a known climate change denialist who is NOT a climate scientist and whose ideas have been rounded debunked by climate scientists
  • when BXVI gave a homily in 2007 (when we first got cable TV), he included a strong emphasis on environmental issues and how we need to mitigate them, but the EWTN commentators didn’t mention a thing about it, only about the other things he said.
Bec of these insults to me as a typical environmentalist concerned about life on earth (esp human life) and wanting to reduce my harm (& hoping others might feel the same) I don’t watch EWTN as much anymore. I also wrote to them some 5 years ago about my concerns, so I hope that had some impact.

Now to be fair, I’m sure there are a few fringe environmental extremists who hate people, but so far I have never met one, and their percentage would be greatly reduced if more people would come aboard mainstream environmentalism & solve the problems. As for earth worshiping, I have not seen that either, figurative references to “mother earth” aside (which even BXVI has made), but I have seen a lot of earth concern. All environmentalists I know are scientifically oriented and understand it is people, not angry earth spirits, who are causing the problems they are concerned about, and people need to solve them in practical ways, and not by propitiating some earth deity.

I understand the Church is rightly concerned about rising neopaganism, but this probably is not directly due to environmental concerns as much as people feeling society’s institutions – government, church, etc – have failed in some way. The very few neopagans I have met I would NOT consider to be environmentalists, and no environmentalist I’ve known is a neopagan…tho there could be some, just as some Protestants, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and atheists are environmentalists.

I think because the Church in the local parishes and on EWTN is not adequately addressing environmental issues we may actually be pushing people into seeking other religions or becoming atheists or neopagan. Perhaps it would be more productive for us to focus on being good and doing good, including solving environmental problems, rather than casting false aspersions on others and upsetting them.

Now see, I’ve just done what I said we should not do – I cast aspersions on the EWTN folks. Shame on me. :imsorry:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top