L
Leon_Bloy
Guest
I think I recall some people saying on the forums that the efficacy of a sacramental might depend on the personal holiness of the priest saying the prayer and doing the blessing (i.e. in the blessing of a rosary or something like that). Like, a rosary blessed by a very holy, devout priest is better than one blessed mechanically by a priest who might not privately believe there is any point to blessing a rosary, even though he might agree to do it and follows all the rubrics in doing so.
Certainly this cannot be the teaching of the Church, right? I have read up on it and nothing is said about this. I know that the sacraments are ex opere operato, but sacramentals are not. It appears to be Church teaching that while the efficacy of the blessing upon the** thing** is always certain, and it always the same no matter what priest does the blessing, since it is done in the name of and by the power of the entire Church, how much we are personally getting out of that blessed thing depends on our own subjective state. My question concerns the certainty of the holiness invested objectively in the thing itself. Can the quality of the priest’s personal holiness, etc. ever affect this?
So, again, my understanding is that if the form and matter are present (a priest recites the prayer of blessing from a Church-approved book over a rosary, and makes the sign of the cross over it), then it is the Church as a whole that is blessing the rosary, and the grace available to a person who then owns it (of course how much they benefit from it depends on their personal faith and disposition) through this sacramental this is “guaranteed” by the Church, even if the priest who blesses it is unhappy to be doing so, or is, unknown to the layperson, in a state of mortal sin, or is halfhearted in performing the blessing, even if he follows the rubrics, etc.
I hope this makes sense. Am I right? Does anybody have any sources they could share on this?
Certainly this cannot be the teaching of the Church, right? I have read up on it and nothing is said about this. I know that the sacraments are ex opere operato, but sacramentals are not. It appears to be Church teaching that while the efficacy of the blessing upon the** thing** is always certain, and it always the same no matter what priest does the blessing, since it is done in the name of and by the power of the entire Church, how much we are personally getting out of that blessed thing depends on our own subjective state. My question concerns the certainty of the holiness invested objectively in the thing itself. Can the quality of the priest’s personal holiness, etc. ever affect this?
So, again, my understanding is that if the form and matter are present (a priest recites the prayer of blessing from a Church-approved book over a rosary, and makes the sign of the cross over it), then it is the Church as a whole that is blessing the rosary, and the grace available to a person who then owns it (of course how much they benefit from it depends on their personal faith and disposition) through this sacramental this is “guaranteed” by the Church, even if the priest who blesses it is unhappy to be doing so, or is, unknown to the layperson, in a state of mortal sin, or is halfhearted in performing the blessing, even if he follows the rubrics, etc.
I hope this makes sense. Am I right? Does anybody have any sources they could share on this?