R
RichSpidizzy
Guest
Pro-Choice Wins IF
Introduction: After 10 years of debating friends and colleagues that support abortion-on-demand, I’m now ready to make a major concession: I think they are right. We shouldn’t deny women the right to choose to kill their unborn offspring. We shouldn’t impose our personal views on abortion. We shouldn’t take away private decisions. In short, I will concede that we shouldn’t restrict abortion at any time and that it should remain legal through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason or no reason **IF **(pause)…IF what? If the “choice” they are offering does not result in the death of an innocent human being. All they must do is prove that the unborn are not human and I will surrender my prolife view. It’s that simple.
Read the rest here:
str.org/free/bioethics/Pro-Choice_Wins_IF.pdf
Introduction: After 10 years of debating friends and colleagues that support abortion-on-demand, I’m now ready to make a major concession: I think they are right. We shouldn’t deny women the right to choose to kill their unborn offspring. We shouldn’t impose our personal views on abortion. We shouldn’t take away private decisions. In short, I will concede that we shouldn’t restrict abortion at any time and that it should remain legal through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason or no reason **IF **(pause)…IF what? If the “choice” they are offering does not result in the death of an innocent human being. All they must do is prove that the unborn are not human and I will surrender my prolife view. It’s that simple.
Read the rest here:
str.org/free/bioethics/Pro-Choice_Wins_IF.pdf