Existance of God

  • Thread starter Thread starter dattaswami
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Continuied from the topic below

The Spirit, which is just the inert created item became Holy due to the existence of God in it. Now Brahman multiplies its little part of the Mula Prakruti in which, Parabrahman does not exist. This means that God enters ninety nine percent of Mula Prakruti and not one percent. This little part of un-divine Mula Prakruti is multiplied by the disturbed equilibrium and the Universe appears. Thus, the pure awareness in which God pervaded becomes Brahman. Now Brahman becomes the spectator of the Universe. The little pure awareness into which God did not enter is modified into the Universe in which God does not exist. Here the modification does not mean materialization. The modification means the undisturbed equilibrium being converted into disturbed equilibrium. In both the states the substance is only awareness. You can compare this to a day-dreamer’s mind. The mind of the day-dreamer is Mula Prakruti. A little part of the mind is converted into dream. The mind, which is not converted, is a spectator of the dream. The dreamer is identified with the spectator part of the mind. Thus the dreamer is witnessing the dream through his unmodified mind. The dreamer has not entered the dream and therefore is not multiplied. When the dream city is burning neither the spectator part of the mind is burnt nor the dreamer. The spectator part of the mind itself can be treated as the dreamer because the dreamer entered that spectator part of the mind and exists in it. Thus, Brahman, the spectator of the Universe can be treated as Parabrahman. Such Parabrahman who is the spectator of the Universe is called as Eeshwara. Thus, Parabrahman is the original unimaginable creator. Mula Prakrithi is the first created item, which is the pure awareness. Brahman is the major part of pure awareness in which Parabrahman entered and occupied it. The same Brahman enjoying the Universe by vision is called as Eeshwara. Neither Parabrahman nor Brahman nor the Eeswara has entered the Universe, which is the disturbed equilibrium of the three qualities. Thus, there is no disturbance in either Parabrahman or Brahman or Eeshwara. In Christianity God is Parabrahman. Brahman and Eeshwara are called as the Holy Spirit. The Spirit is the substance with which the Universe is made of. The spirit is not Holy because God did not occupy it. Thus the Universe is not Holy in Toto. It is Holy with reference to the good devotees and the divine incarnations. It is unholy with reference to bad living beings and Saturn. Parabrahman who is a spectator for sometime develops a desire to enter this Universe in the form of a living being especially as a human being because the main aim is to preach the divine knowledge. Veda says the same (Tadevaanu Praavishat). This divine human being in which, Parabrahman or Brahman or Eeshwara exists is called as human incarnation or God in Flesh. The human incarnation consists of four items. The first item is God. The second item is the Mula Prakruti, which is the pure awareness or Brahman or Aatman or Karana Sareeram (Casual Body). The third item is the disturbed equilibrium of the three qualities called as Jeeva or Sukshma Sareera (Subtle Body). The fourth item is the Gross body made of five elements (Sthula Sareera) which is again imaginary only in view of God but a materialized form in view of other human beings. If you analyse any ordinary living being it contains all the three bodies except God. If we analyse any inert item of the world it contains only the Gross Body made of the five elements.

God should be understood as the unimaginable creator. Next God can be understood as the unimaginable spectator of the world. Lastly, God should be understood as the unimaginable actor who has entered the Universal Drama in the form of Human Incarnation.
 
God should be understood as the unimaginable creator. Next God can be understood as the unimaginable spectator of the world. Lastly, God should be understood as the unimaginable actor who has entered the Universal Drama in the form of Human Incarnation.
How can we know if a person is the incarnation of a god? What are the criteria? They perform miracles, or don’t die?

More assertions than I’ve ever heard from a single post.
 
How can we know if a person is the incarnation of a god?

More assertions than I’ve ever heard from a single post.
** Who is the human incarnation in the present human generation?**

In the Chemistry laboratory the practical procedure is given to you and the salt is given. According to the procedure you have to analyze the substance and find out the name of the salt by yourself. Veda says that the infinite true special knowledge, which cannot be preached by any one and which generates love and bliss in our hearts is the main characteristic of the Lord.

He possesses super powers but does not use for exhibition due to egoism. By these confirmatory tests you can find out the fullest form of the Lord (Paripurna Avatara) who is Lord Datta himself. Of course all the preachers are the human incarnations of the disciples of Lord Datta. Some are the partial incarnations of Lord Datta like Kalavatara, Amsavatara etc.,
 
I like Terevada Buddhism better. Hinduism has come up with some wierd pointless stuff. The caste system and god reincarnating himself and the other specifities of Hindu reincarnation the like are also bull. The original religion did start off quite well though. I really doubt you’re a special brahmin or are a reincarnation of a disciple.
God should be understood as the unimaginable creator. Next God can be understood as the unimaginable spectator of the world. Lastly, God should be understood as the unimaginable actor who has entered the Universal Drama in the form of Human Incarnation.
-dattaswami

For saying Brahman is neti neti, you sure do claim to know a lot about him. Not from just that quote, but from everything you said on this post. Good luck on your search for Atman.
 
I like Terevada Buddhism better. Hinduism has come up with some wierd pointless stuff. The caste system and god reincarnating himself and the other specifities of Hindu reincarnation the like are also bull. The original religion did start off quite well though. I really doubt you’re a special brahmin or are a reincarnation of a disciple.

-dattaswami

For saying Brahman is neti neti, you sure do claim to know a lot about him. Not from just that quote, but from everything you said on this post. Good luck on your search for Atman.
I’ve always had a strong attraction to Vajrayana/Thunderbolt Buddhism. This is probably because I see a lot of elements of my faith present in it. Just a “side-thought”. 🙂
 
In the event that someone might be embarrassed in a different setting, existence is NOT spelled existAnce.😊 😊
 
Dattaswami is more of a universalist type, one who believes not in a monolithic God or monotheistic theology, but in many really. He posts in other forums and does not discuss much at all, just pasting the same thing again and again and…

you get the idea. Just go to biblenet.net and see the actions of this person and you will see that there is no discussion whatsoever on the level of reality.

This respect the beliefs of this person, yet I do not agree with them.

I do not think that dattaswami should be posting in this section of the forums, but in the non catholic religion section, as that is what he claims.

I will not be responding to any of the posts from dattaswami but have a feeling I will be reporting his posts(pastes) to the moderators sometime soon. I could be wrong, maybe he will actually discuss something in this forum?

you never know…

peace, papist
 
Dattaswami is more of a universalist type, one who believes not in a monolithic God or monotheistic theology, but in many really. He posts in other forums and does not discuss much at all, just pasting the same thing again and again and…

you get the idea. Just go to biblenet.net and see the actions of this person and you will see that there is no discussion whatsoever on the level of reality.

This respect the beliefs of this person, yet I do not agree with them.

I do not think that dattaswami should be posting in this section of the forums, but in the non catholic religion section, as that is what he claims.

I will not be responding to any of the posts from dattaswami but have a feeling I will be reporting his posts(pastes) to the moderators sometime soon. I could be wrong, maybe he will actually discuss something in this forum?

you never know…

peace, papist
Justin…look at the date on this thead. Over 2 years ago.

That guys was banned from here long ago. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top