D
The concept of âYawistic, Elohistic and priestlyâ threads comes from the now-refuted Higher Criticism theory. Most scholars donât believe in Higher Criticism anymore.According the Navarre commentary it has to do with sacred traditions and the writer/writers of the Exodus not wanting to tamper with itâŚ
in Numbers 10:29 he is called Hobab the son of Reuel
in Judges 1:16 and 4:11 he is not considered a midianite, heâs called Heber the Kenite
nothing more, itâs strange I think. It could be, my opinion, since there are Yawistic, Elohistic and priestly ⌠âthreadsâ throughout the pentatuech that the different traditions were held by different writers. Just a guess on my part.
D-R Bible, Haydock Commentary:Does anyone know why Jethro is referred to as Reuel in Ex 2:18? Thanks for any help with this.
![]()
I think that sometimes the english translation of the navarre leaves a lot to be desired. Looking at NAB is indicates that Hobab is Mosesâ brother-in-law(Numbers) and thus from the judges 4 passage means that hobab could be the Kenite Heber. In Judges 1 though it does reference Mosesâ father-in-law. But hard to determine if he(Jethro) is being called a Kenite and it means his(Jethroâs) descendants or if he(Jethro) descends from a Kenite. Different translations. Makes all this fun, if you ask me. I do agree that Reuel could really be a title. Most important though is what the author is trying to convey, and i donât think that the author is trying to make definite statements on genealogyThe concept of âYawistic, Elohistic and priestlyâ threads comes from the now-refuted Higher Criticism theory. Most scholars donât believe in Higher Criticism anymore.
As for Numbers 10:29, where does it say that âHobabâ is âJethroâ? It just says âHobabâ is one of Mosesâ relatives. Could be anybody.
As for Judges 1:16 and 4:11, again how is that connected to Jethro?