A
aball1035
Guest
What are the “works” one must do to be saved? Is it just sacraments like baptism or others?
I thought people in a state of sanctifying grace and who are baptized get to Heaven. How do we know if we’re up to par on the expectations?Its different for each of us. What gifts have you been given? If you read the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats, you’ll get a general idea of what Christ expects of you during your daily life. But a reading of the Parable of the Talents will show that those who receive much, more will be expected from.
In short, there is no “minimum daily requirement” of faith and works that will get one into heaven.
What did I say that disagrees with your thoughts? Although good works don’t “earn Sanctifying Grace”, they do please God and He is a God of Justice, isn’t He? In other words, doesn’t He reward His sheep?I thought people in a state of sanctifying grace and who are baptized get to Heaven.
How do we know if we’re up to par? In my thinking, If I know I’m up to par, then I’ve still got a long way to go to get to heaven. It’s in humbleness that we best approach God, not in “confidence that we are up to par”.How do we know if we’re up to par on the expectations?
The “Faith Versus Works” controversy is a “false dichotomy.” It is a “great deal of sound and fury signifying nothing.”What are the “works” one must do to be saved? Is it just sacraments like baptism or others?
Then what does James mean when he says “Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.” (James 2:17)? How about James 2:22 (“Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?”)? And James 2:26 (“For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also”)?Faith is a work – an act of the Will in response to grace. Works are faith in motion. There is true equivalency.
Despite the fact that there is true equivalency, by custom we refer to the works which we can see NOT as “faith,” but rather as “works.” So, though there is equivalency, we see two different words, and one word frequently used to the exclusion of the other.Then what does James mean when he says “Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.” (James 2:17)? How about James 2:22 (“Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?”)? And James 2:26 (“For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also”)?
In John 17:4, Jesus says, “I have glorified thee on the earth; I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.” Notice that Jesus did the works His Father gave Him to do. God gives us the works, and it’s through the Holy Spirit that we discover and perform the works God has given us (for example, Peter healed a beggar on the way to the Temple; Peter preaches the Word to the gentiles; Philip opens the Scriptures to the eunuch from Ethiopia; Paul has scales fall off his eyes, gets baptized and joins the Faith; etc…).
I can provide a general answer, but works are a personal choice, based in part on opportunity.=aball1035;5330152]What are the “works” one must do to be saved? Is it just sacraments like baptism or others?
I MEANT to write,Despite the fact that there is true equivalency, by custom we refer to the works which we can see NOT as “faith,” but rather as “works.” So, though there is equivalency, we see two different words, and one word frequently used to the exclusion of the other.
And yet, note that James himself implies equivalency when he says that “faith” is made perfect by “works.” If “faith” and “works” are “mortally severed,” how could this be true? Again, “works” are “faith in motion.” Your works are “good works” unless they are somehow motivated by some form of fait. And faith isn’t “real” unless it is ready, willing and able to jump into action and become a work.
Heb 11:1 says, “Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the evidence of things that appear not.” Where does this say anything about faith being a work? Can you do any works without faith? I would like to know what your definition of “faith” and “works” is. Do you consider them interchangeable?Despite the fact that there is true equivalency, by custom we refer to the works which we can see NOT as “faith,” rather than as “works.” So, though there is equivalency, we see two different words employed, and one word frequently used to the exclusion of the other.
And yet, note that James himself implies equivalency when he says that “faith” is made perfect by “works.” If “faith” and “works” are “mortally severed,” how could this be true? Again, “works” are “faith in motion.” Your works are “good works” unless they are somehow motivated by some form of fait. And faith isn’t “real” unless it is ready, willing and able to jump into action and become a work.
That doesn’t, but this does:Heb 11:1 says, “Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the evidence of things that appear not.” Where does this say anything about faith being a work?
No good occurs on Earth unless it is motivated by grace. So, for a work to be a “good work” – what we mean to be an example of “works” in the great faith/works debate – there HAS TO BE grace down there.Can you do any works without faith?
I think Peter Dawson means that faith is, in itself, an act. It is something that people do: it requires an act of will and manifests itself in our other actions. To say that faith is just a thought, removed from works, is like saying “I think about dieting” as opposed to saying “I am dieting.” Only in one of those scenarios are you actually going to lose weight. Similarly, it is impossible for us to have faith and not have it inform our actions. One cannot say “I have faith” even as they reach for another box of Twinkies and their waist expands.Heb 11:1 says, “Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the evidence of things that appear not.” Where does this say anything about faith being a work? Can you do any works without faith? I would like to know what your definition of “faith” and “works” is. Do you consider them interchangeable?
=Peter Dawson;5332313]I MEANT to write,
Despite the fact that there is true equivalency, by custom we refer to the works which we can see NOT as “faith,” rather than as “works.” So, though there is equivalency, we see two different words employed, and one word frequently used to the exclusion of the other.
***Heb. 6: 9 “Though we speak thus, yet in your case, beloved, we feel sure of better things that belong to salvation. 10 For God is not so unjust as to overlook your work and the love which you showed for his sake in serving the saints, as you still do.” ***And yet, note that James himself implies equivalency when he says that “faith” is made perfect by “works.” If “faith” and “works” are “mortally severed,” how could this be true? Again, “works” are “faith in motion.” Your works are “good works” unless they are somehow motivated by some form of fait. And faith isn’t “real” unless it is ready, willing and able to jump into action and become a work.