M
manualman
Guest
I’m of zero help on the legal front, but it might help you to realize that many women rape victims have to deal with this as well. Female genital responses may not be as easily visible as male ones, but some women rape survivors absolutely have to deal with feeling like their own bodies betrayed them through involuntary stimulus responses (to put it delicately).As a prosecutor you have privy and full knowledge of the law that even police officers don’t have full knowledge of. I guess my question relates to something I mentioned in my original post having to do with a male rape victim under examination of the justice courts by an attorney stating he got an erection while being forcibly sodomized. Would the court of law unwittingly take such to mean automatic guilt on the male victim under duress?
That would be like court saying the male victim enjoyed it given the present laws (clarification needed)… state they (do not recognize that men can be raped through penetration, because of course an erection means consent). Such laws **if true **sounds ludicrous and extremely bias.
Absolutely no potentially involuntary bodily reaction should be considered evidence for the defense. That’s how I’d vote on a jury.