T
Think
Guest
BUT…what a great read this web page is…if you never been to the straight dope website…you should check it out sometime.
straightdope.com/classics/a2_139.html
straightdope.com/classics/a2_139.html
I may be wrong, but I think Cecil makes an error in a response at the end:BUT…what a great read this web page is…if you never been to the straight dope website…you should check it out sometime.
straightdope.com/classics/a2_139.html
I think he is confusing papal infallibility speaking ex catherdra as being extraordinary and when he speaks at other times being ordinary. My understanding is that the Ordinary magisterium is constant Church teaching and is infallible. So birth control teaching can not change because it is constant Church teaching, hence infallible, correct?
- Regarding papal infallibility, the Encyclopedia Britannica says, “The definition of the first Vatican Council … states the conditions under which a pope may be said to have spoken infallibly, or ex cathedra. It is prerequisite that the pope intend to demand irrevocable assent from the entire church in some aspect of faith or morals.” The ordinary teachings of the Church, by contrast, are not infallible. The pope can say what he likes about birth control, for example, and Catholics are obliged to obey, at least in the conservative view. But until he makes an infallible pronouncement on the subject, he has the option of someday changing his mind.
I may be wrong, but I think Cecil makes an error in a response at the end:
I think he is confusing papal infallibility speaking ex catherdra as being extraordinary and when he speaks at other times being ordinary. My understanding is that the Ordinary magisterium is constant Church teaching and is infallible. So birth control teaching can not change because it is constant Church teaching, hence infallible, correct?
Scott