Feminine liturgical music

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArthurQArch
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cat, I write music too. Although when I led a small choir, we did sing some responsorials I’d written - and they were well-received - AND people sang - there’s no way I’d submit them for consideration. Not because I don’t think they’re good enough, or because they’re not correct according to the teachings of the Church, but because it’s such an elitist environment.
 
Several of you (Cat and Sarabande) are blaming the culture, and I would agree. But aren’t we supposed to transform the culture instead of just accepting it as is? I do not like the old hymns because they are old, I like them because they are majestic, glorious, and sacred. They, at least in my opinion are fitting for the celebration of Mass.

Dan9of11: I’m a man and I sing too, and when we do sing, I think we more fully participate in the Sacrifice than men who don’t. I think this is part of what VCII intended as a “fuller participation in the Mass by the laity.” We need more men in the pews, not just choirs, to sing. The problem today is: if Daddy isn’t singing, do you really think that his boys will? No way. The old saying is: A child learns his/her faith from their mother, and they learn how to practice their faith from their father. But the cycle can be broken. I can never remember even once my dad singing, but I sing, and my kids sing too. I think they get some strange looks from people (especially kids their own age), but they usually don’t mind.

JCServant: I don’t even know where to start, so in charity, I will not.
 
The issue isn’t so much about the music being feminine- there’s nothing wrong with femininity. The problem is what seems to be an attempt to deny the sinfulness of mankind, the reality of Jesus’ sacrifice, and the reality of God’s justice. Those things need to be emphasized- but not to make people feel ashamed. They need to be emphasized because it is in our awareness of the sinfulness of mankind, the reality of Jesus’ sacrifice, and the reality of God’s justice that we are made aware of- and can come to appreciate- the reality of our status as children of God, the reality of Jesus’ love for us, and the reality of God’s mercy that is offered to whoever will accept it.
I forgot to add that I loathe “On Eagles Wings.” One of the worst liturgical pieces I’ve ever heard. Everybody seems to love it and nobody can sing it. But everybody tries.
If I could make decisions on the music, I’d never use that in church. It has too wide a range for the untrained singer to sing well.
 
How many of you are women that are saying the issue isn’t that of femininity? I’m not saying that you have to be a male to see it that way, but . . . geez. A lot of women love this stuff, and a lot of men don’t.
 
Several of you (Cat and Sarabande) are blaming the culture, and I would agree. But aren’t we supposed to transform the culture instead of just accepting it as is? I do not like the old hymns because they are old, I like them because they are majestic, glorious, and sacred. They, at least in my opinion are fitting for the celebration of Mass.
I think you are missing my main point. You were blaming a feminisation of music. My point is that there is no such thing as placing a gender on music. Music is either bad or good, cheesy or beautiful, wimpy or majestic. There are just as many women who don’t like this same music as the men.

Personally, I actually don’t and never did accept culture as it is. I’ve always been one who marched to the beat of a different drummer. My family has always been that way and it is probably why so many people have found my family unusual in a good way. Many of my friends have wished they had my family. We never tried to be different, but we just didn’t care about pleasing others and did things our own way. And by no means are my parents rebels, nor were they hippies or anything like that. They just did their own thing and raised us to be independent people and thinkers, to ask questions, to analyze, read, learn, treat all people with love and compassion, never judging others, etc.

I was describing to you what I’ve observed and have concluded from my own experience, knowledge of history, music history and liturgical music history and as a professional musician. Basically, I was stating facts and alternative reasons/observations for why it seemed men didn’t sing.

From the time I chose to leave the Newman Center at my college and join the choir of one of the only parishes in the city at the time who still continued to do the timeless sacred repertoire of great composers, of chant, etc., I went against the grain, the current culture with what was common in many of the parishes of my youth and young adulthood. A couple years later when I worked for a Catholic school and church as the music teacher/children’s music director, I further did that by proving that children were smart and able and enjoyed singing chant. I created a music club to teach them about the composers and music of their Catholic heritage, to broaden and open their minds and let them know that there was much more to Catholic liturgical music than “On Eagles Wings” and “Here I Am, Lord”. They are probably some of the few Catholic kids who had even heard of Palestrina. I never had that opportunity to learn about them as a kid their age, having always felt stifled and pandered to as a child. I didn’t want that to happen to my students and felt that it was my responsibility while God led me within that path in my life to introduce them to something much more than what they were getting.

When I am hired for weddings, this is another opportunity for me to introduce couples to repertoire and composers that they may have never heard of. Most of them are from my generation and younger and all grew up exposed to the same kind of background in liturgical music. I’ve even had some couples request Latin chant mass parts when they realized how prayerful and beautiful they were.

Also, in your quote
But aren’t we supposed to transform the culture instead of just accepting it as is?
I’ve answered that in my previous posts in regards to one of the ways to improve the situation for males. And the same can be done for all people. We can gripe and complain, but unless we are in the “trenches” working to make the change, working to change the attitudes of people by being examples either in encouraging music and singing with our children or by working in the parishes or by example in our musicianship, all it will still be is griping and complaining with nothing else to change the culture and society of the times. In my work as a musician and as a liturgical musician, I have gotten my hands dirty and have been doing the work - since my college days. I’m not the type to just throw up my hands and give up no matter how much I’m pushed down. My parents didn’t raise me to be that way. Little by little a good musician who truly loves the musical heritage of the Church and who truly believes in holding high standards for sacred music that was written in the past and in the present, can make a difference with the people he who she comes in contact with. You will get backlash and negative energy, but you just continue on without bitterness and with complete love. It’s very easy to become bitter. When I was in my early 20s, I was borderline bitter because of how mean, cruel and controlling those people who were totally against anything pre-1970 were. Now I’m actually fairly calm about it and use my head and my love. I’ve also come to realize that I was not just a some lone island on my own. That many people have felt the same way - especially other musicians. Unfortunately, we’ve lost some who were so beaten down that they’ve finally just left music ministry in general or began work at Protestant congregations which still loved and respected this sacred music treasury. They had to do it for their own sanity and to keep them from hating those who worked in the Church.
 
How many of you are women that are saying the issue isn’t that of femininity? I’m not saying that you have to be a male to see it that way, but . . . geez. A lot of women love this stuff, and a lot of men don’t.
Again… many women I know and have met also don’t love this stuff, including myself. And some of these women aren’t musicians or into reading and history, the arts and all that. They’re normal Janes, not geeks like me. 😃 A lot of women (who either like or dislike the other stuff) also love the so-called “masculine” hymns. And there are plenty of men today who could care less about any kind of hymn - majestic or cheesy. Some may enjoy hearing them, but still won’t sing them.
 
The issue isn’t so much about the music being feminine- there’s nothing wrong with femininity. The problem is what seems to be an attempt to deny the sinfulness of mankind, the reality of Jesus’ sacrifice, and the reality of God’s justice. Those things need to be emphasized- but not to make people feel ashamed. They need to be emphasized because it is in our awareness of the sinfulness of mankind, the reality of Jesus’ sacrifice, and the reality of God’s justice that we are made aware of- and can come to appreciate- the reality of our status as children of God, the reality of Jesus’ love for us, and the reality of God’s mercy that is offered to whoever will accept it.

If I could make decisions on the music, I’d never use that in church. It has too wide a range for the untrained singer to sing well.
Take an honest look at many of the older hymns. E.g., For All The Saints–one of my Top Ten favorites, BTW, starts out on the off beat on that terribly high note, and warbles all over the place, including down into the lower regions! It’s definitely not a song for the tone-deaf to attempt, but does that mean it shouldn’t be used? IMO, it’s a song that allows the trained talented singer, and someone who is trained but not talented (like me!) to sing out and bless everyone around them, and it trains the ears of young children.

Here is my feeling about songs with a wide range–THAT’S why God created Sopranos, Altos, Tenors, and Basses. We ALL help each other–that’s why it’s called CONGREGATIONAL (or corporate) singing. If just the sopranos and tenors sing, they growl on the low notes. If just the altos and basses sing, they squeak on the high notes. But when we ALL sing TOGETHER, we all glorify God using the voices that HE gave us!

That’s why I love the Star Spangled Banner as a national anthem–it requires EVERYONE to sing in order to sound good. I really let loose on the lower parts of the anthem, but then draw back on the high notes and allow my soprano and tenor brothers and sisters to let loose and thrill everyone.

So this is yet another reason to argue in favor of hymnals and missallettes, song sheets and overheads, printing not only the lyrics, but the four part harmony–it’s a recognition that God made people with different voices.
 
Forgive me if I sound curmudgeonly, but I sometimes think that some of the people who post about hymns that are “too high” need to think about what they’re really saying! What they’re asking for is hymns with about a five note range! That certainly stifles creativity, and limits the congregation to a very mediocre selection of melodies. Yuck.

As humans, we are capable of getting the training to be able to widen our singing range. I personally think that rather than sitting in the pew without singing, or complaining that the song is “too high,” people should go and get a few voice lessons or take a group singing class. I have NEVER seen a song in a hymnal that is too high for healthy people. The songs are just too high for those who have never bothered to learn how to sing.

I realize that voice lessons and singing classes usually cost money, and not everyone has money. Well, then just like you learn to use cheap Ramen noodles creatively, then get creative with your desire to learn to sing. Go to the church choir director or to someone you know that has a beautiful voice, and ask them to please give you a few lessons in exchange for a housecleaning, or a yard-mowing, or whatever. Almost anyone can learn to sing in a head voice, which allows you to reach the higher notes.

I’m sorry, but I just think that it’s ridiculous when people say that the hymns, either traditional or modern, are too high. I’ve played piano in churches for almost 40 years, and I know what’s too high, and it isn’t church hymns. Sandy Patty songs and Steve Green songs are “too high” for the average singer. “On Eagles Wings” is not too high. You just have to learn how to sing it correctly.
 
I used to write music. I’ve been Catholic for five years, and I would frankly be afraid to even try to compose something. I’m afraid I couldn’t handle all the liturgical experts who know more than the bishops about proper Mass music. Catholic critics can be very cruel. Have you ever heard some of the names that Marty Haugen is called by the traditionalists on this forum? And some of the snarky insults about his songs? It’s not worth it, friend. I’m not an armadillo–my skin is too soft to take that much criticism. I would be crying constantly.

And I think other musicians probably feel the same way I do. Why would anyone deliberately throw themselves in front of a 18-wheeler?

As for your comments about the old hymns, it’s very possible that it’s not the actual hymn that the people enjoy, but rather, the nostalgic reminder of days of long ago.

Whenever I hear the hymn, He’s Everything To Me, I will get all emotional, not because it’s a good hymn (it really isn’t that great), but because it was the first “teenaged hymn” in the Jesus Rock genre that I remember, and I loved being a teenager and I loved the whole era of Explo 72 and the Jesus People and the Born Once Die Twice, Born Twice, Die Once era. It was an exciting time to be teenager.

Back then, He’s Everything To Me was considered shocking and worldly. Now it’s Christian elevator music, and Senior citizens sing it in their Wheelchair Choirs. Here’s a link in case you want to hear it: youtube.com/watch?v=FvgspvBVEUo
Hmm… I’m not sure what to say pal. We all have gifts given to us by God. He gave me a good strong voice and I am using it to sing his praises, to cantor or whatever is required of me. I’m not bothered by name calling or what others say, or stares or looks, I got past all that kind of nonsense back in grade school.😉

I don’t think all people are nostalgic about Blessed Sacrament hymns or Blessed Mother hymns. I think it’s a genuine appreciation for Sacred Music. I listened to your selection and we each have our own taste in music, I didn’t particularly care for that selection anymore then I care for I Received the Living God. I think there are some better selections here: Top Ten Catholic Hymns🙂
 
I don’t think all people are nostalgic about Blessed Sacrament hymns or Blessed Mother hymns. I think it’s a genuine appreciation for Sacred Music.
I’ve now seen the phrase sacred music used a couple of times. IMHO, sacred music is a relative term. To me sacred would be something as reverant as possible, very low key, with little majesty and pomp. Tu Scendi Dalle Stelle would not be considered a sacred hymn, however it was the recessional hymn at the midnight mass in the Vatican. Jesus Christ is Risen Today is another piece I wouldn’t considered sacred, but how many churches use that to close Holy Saturday mass? I would considered those pieces triumphant, used to celebrate great joys which God has given us through His son.

What people need to remember (even myself) is that we are part of a church that is 2000 years old, and most of the pieces people refer to as traditional are only at most 500 years old. Sure, that sounds old, but at some point when these hymns were introduced they were considered new and modern, changing music to reflect society at the time.
 
I’ve now seen the phrase sacred music used a couple of times. IMHO, sacred music is a relative term. To me sacred would be something as reverant as possible, very low key, with little majesty and pomp. Tu Scendi Dalle Stelle would not be considered a sacred hymn, however it was the recessional hymn at the midnight mass in the Vatican. Jesus Christ is Risen Today is another piece I wouldn’t considered sacred, but how many churches use that to close Holy Saturday mass? I would considered those pieces triumphant, used to celebrate great joys which God has given us through His son.
I found this to be an interesting commentary on what sacred music music is. The author also uses sources from “Musicam Sacram” and “Tra le Sollecitudini”.

adoremus.org/0603SacredMusic.html

This thread on Pope Benedict’s article on the Theological Problems of Church Music, which is a very interesting read, I think corresponds with what is being discussed here in its own way.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=360606
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top