C
CatCat
Guest
foxnews.com/story/0,2933,173332,00.html
This is a sneaky little article. The first paragraph contains the sentence “If you believe abortion to be murder in all cases, stop reading now.” Interestingly, Mr. Frost is supposedly making a pro-life argument FOR the Morning After Pill. I sent this in response to him:
Mr. Frost,
I’m one of those people that you told to stop reading, but I didn’t. I believe abortion to be murder in all cases. At first glance, you seem to feel the same, but I am quite glad I kept reading. Now I know not to defend your stance to others. It is sad that you believe the MAP to be an alternative to abortion. The 72 hours statistic is quite misleading, just as the assertion that the birth control pill suppresses ovulation is misleading. If a woman has sex while she is ovulating, conception can occur within 72 hours. The makers of the MAP know this, so they (and birth control pill makers) design their “medication” with a “backup feature” that makes the lining of the uterus unfavorable to the implantation of a fertilized egg, which causes an abortion of the earliest variety. This is actually a big part of the reason that the Catholic Church is against both the birth control pill and the MAP. Even Planned Parenthood and most doctors understand and admit that the Pill, even with perfect use, does not completely stop ovulation. The MAP is the same way. You are putting forth misinformation, which is unfortunate if done unintentionally. Please research this further. You can check websites like the Vatican’s and www.ccli.org for information on these chemical “contraceptives” and natural alternatives.
Also, aside from the abortifacient nature of the MAP, it has also been linked to at least one death of an otherwise healthy girl of 18. The delay by the FDA may not only by for the moral reasons that you suggest.
Thank you for your time.
CatCat (no, I didn’t really sign it that way)
There is a link to send the author an email, and foxviews is cc’d. Just thought you guys might like to chime in.
This is a sneaky little article. The first paragraph contains the sentence “If you believe abortion to be murder in all cases, stop reading now.” Interestingly, Mr. Frost is supposedly making a pro-life argument FOR the Morning After Pill. I sent this in response to him:
Mr. Frost,
I’m one of those people that you told to stop reading, but I didn’t. I believe abortion to be murder in all cases. At first glance, you seem to feel the same, but I am quite glad I kept reading. Now I know not to defend your stance to others. It is sad that you believe the MAP to be an alternative to abortion. The 72 hours statistic is quite misleading, just as the assertion that the birth control pill suppresses ovulation is misleading. If a woman has sex while she is ovulating, conception can occur within 72 hours. The makers of the MAP know this, so they (and birth control pill makers) design their “medication” with a “backup feature” that makes the lining of the uterus unfavorable to the implantation of a fertilized egg, which causes an abortion of the earliest variety. This is actually a big part of the reason that the Catholic Church is against both the birth control pill and the MAP. Even Planned Parenthood and most doctors understand and admit that the Pill, even with perfect use, does not completely stop ovulation. The MAP is the same way. You are putting forth misinformation, which is unfortunate if done unintentionally. Please research this further. You can check websites like the Vatican’s and www.ccli.org for information on these chemical “contraceptives” and natural alternatives.
Also, aside from the abortifacient nature of the MAP, it has also been linked to at least one death of an otherwise healthy girl of 18. The delay by the FDA may not only by for the moral reasons that you suggest.
Thank you for your time.
CatCat (no, I didn’t really sign it that way)
There is a link to send the author an email, and foxviews is cc’d. Just thought you guys might like to chime in.