Fr. Abrahamowicz interviewed about the Williamson affair

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldmass
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

Yea --sure. Make yourself believe that.
Burden of proof is on you, my friend. What grounds would people call him anti-Semitic on? Or are you under the impression that people get called anti-Semitic just for the heck of it?
 
i agree with everything the priest said. he clearly holds the bishops same views but so do i. in the end 6 million, 800,000 or more or less doesn’t really matter. the bishop isn’t denying nazi’s were targeting jews, simply the scale and methods used.

however the “6 million” number is essentially a number pulled out of thin air without any proof to back it up. according to census figures the population of worldwide jews increased by over half a million between 1938 and 1948, i don’t see how that’s possible if “6 out of 10 jews were killed in the holocaust”…

saying a number that can’t be corroborated is wrong, bullying people with the “anti-semite” moniker if they find their research simply doesn’t jive with popular belief is wrong. jailing people for denying the scale and methods used in the holocaust is wrong.
And i suppose you got the "data’ form an objective source and were investigating out of pure dispassionate interest. Youa re one pulling things out of thin air. Unless you can provide some actual documentation for you assertions, why should we believe you? It was precisely family birth records and census information that proves the 6 million number. It is pure bias or ignorance that would make someone say otherwise.
 
Burden of proof is on you, my friend. What grounds would people call him anti-Semitic on? Or are you under the impression that people get called anti-Semitic just for the heck of it?

Well Lujack --If our Lord returned and again spoke as He did --this would be a threat to current day “ecumenism” and of course quite offensive to Jewish sensibilities. Now include current day “thought” that anyone who causes such an offense --must have some deep seeded dislike for the Jews–what some would go as far as to call “hatred”. So it is more than likely and quite feasible that within this --anti-semitism–would come into play.
 

Well Lujack --If our Lord returned and again spoke as He did --this would be a threat to current day “ecumenism” and of course quite offensive to Jewish sensibilities. Now include current day “thought” that anyone who causes such an offense --must have some deep seeded dislike for the Jews–what some would go as far as to call “hatred”. So it is more than likely and quite feasible that within this --anti-semitism–would come into play.
So…if a Jew called himself the Messiah, he’d be called anti-Semitic?
 
So…if a Jew called himself the Messiah, he’d be called anti-Semitic?

Taking it from what now is being pushed -that causing distress to Jewish sensibilities —arises from some deep seeded “dislike” or even “hatred” for the Jews – Our Lord would again find Himself as the “unfit” --so yes --it would fit the profile of anti-semitism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top