Full Consent When Saying Bad Things Impulsively

  • Thread starter Thread starter imo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

imo

Guest
Hello.

We talk a lot about temptation in thinking, like thinking something sinful and put away fastly is not a sin, only a temptation.

However, if someone struggles with impulsiviness and tell things to others without thinking, just as they pop during a conversation and immediatly after saying repents either because of the content or the offense it causes for the other person, could it be consider a temptation or that full consent was not present - in the case the person really knows it did not think about before saying?
 
Last edited:
Impulsivity wouldn’t be full consent but there would still be some culpability for the sin.

The order of things goes:

Thoughts become words
Words become actions
Actions become habits
Habits become character

So the starting point for every and any sin is to confront your thoughts.
 
TK421 said:
Impulsivity wouldn’t be full consent but there would still be some culpability for the sin.
Click to expand...
It seems to me that it would be a sin, but not mortal because of the lacking complete consent. What do you think?
 
Last edited:
Depends on your maturity. For a 5 year old? They are going to have very little impulse control over their words or actions. Parents and teachers work to help them learn to control these impulses.

For an adult who is not suffering from an intellectual disability, there is greater responsibility to have mastered their tongue (St Paul writes about this)

Begin to work on impulse control. When we are spiritually lax and don’t try to work on controlling our passions, we can move into

Think before you speak! Literally, pause and count to 10, consider how your words will land.
 
You might want to discuss this with a priest. He would be better to answer the specifics of a situation.
 
Just like learning to play piano or to lift weights, it takes time to master. The important thing is to keep working, recognize when you make a mistake, don’t be too proud to apologize.
 
imo said:
40.png
TK421:
Impulsivity wouldn’t be full consent but there would still be some culpability for the sin.
Click to expand...
It seems to me that it would be a sin, but not mortal because of the lacking complete consent. What do you think?
Click to expand...
Probably not. Mortal sin is not spontaneous as a general rule.

But then the trap the devil would set here is to make the person use this knowledge to become lenient towards breaking the habit. Any sin - including venial sin - needs to be avoided no matter the cost.
 
Last edited:
imo said:
Hello.

We talk a lot about temptation in thinking, like thinking something sinful and put away fastly is not a sin, only a temptation.

However, if someone struggles with impulsiviness and tell things to others without thinking, just as they pop during a conversation and immediatly after saying repents either because of the content or the offense it causes for the other person, could it be consider a temptation or that full consent was not present - in the case the person really knows it did not think about before saying?
Click to expand...
There must be sufficient reflection for full consent, really the key question is was it a personal choice. There is no actual sin without either full or partial consent.
 
TheLittleLady said:
40.png
Vico:
There is no actual sin without either full or partial consent.
Click to expand...
There is still actual sin, the culpability is reduced or eliminated.
Click to expand...
Actual sin is formal sin, material sin in objective sin. One is culpable for actual sin but not for material sin.

Baltimore Catechism
Q. 285. What are sins committed without reflection or consent called?
A. Sins committed without reflection or consent are called material sins; that is, they would be formal or real sins if we knew their sinfulness at the time we committed them. Thus to eat flesh meat on a day of abstinence without knowing it to be a day of abstinence or without thinking of the prohibition, would be a material sin.
Click to expand...
Catholic Encyclopedia explains:
Actual sin is committed by a free personal act of the individual will.

Since a voluntary act and its disorder are of the essence of sin, venial sin as it is a voluntary act may be defined as a thought, word or deed at variance with the law of God.
Click to expand...
O’Neil, A.C. (1912). Sin. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
Ecclesiastical approbation. Nihil Obstat. July 1, 1912. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor. Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14004b.htm
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top