I should have been more clear about what is “illegal”, sorry for the misunderstanding. Well, I think if you were doing what you are doing in a public school, than, yes, technically it would find many opponents and invite numerous lawsuits as a teacher.
I’ll be teaching at a Catholic church so there shouldn’t be any legal problems. It is not a public school, nor is it a private school. I’m not a professional educator, only a volunteer teaching once a week on Sundays.
As for the creation of life–bluntly put, I mean talking about sex and creation processes. A little too much for them at that age, but I have always believed they are ready to understand those things around the age of 7 or even earlier, but that is only my personal opinion as an educator. I personally believe this to be the absolute evidence of the existence of God. The “intelligent design” term is just secular compromising to make secularists and worried modernists happy.
I don’t plan on delving into sex or the creation process at all. I was going to pose some questions and help them to understand at a basic level the arguments for God’s existence.
I cannot fully understand your dilemma in a teaching plan here. In a public situation, one would have to follow what the powers that be dictate. Don’t they have an outline as to how to go about your subject matter, as it relates to the young mind ? What role is there in the school administration. Will you have a priest helping you?
Our CCD program is entirely volunteer run and I don’t believe any of the teachers are professional educators. We’re pretty much on our own in coming up with lesson plans. I’m using the “Faith and Life” series as a guideline to set my own syllabus.
Bear in mind your goal: Your attempting to explain to 5th graders the fact that it is not unreasonable to believe in God and** He can be proven** using human reason. I have personally argued this point with college professors, and had no luck. I don’t believe you will find the 5th graders in opposition to what you say, as I hope they are already aware of the existence of God by that phase in life. The age of reason and level of reasoning skills as individuals can be varied in that age group.
Of course they probably already accept by faith that God is real and He exists. I think I’m hoping to strengthen that existing faith by giving additional rationales grounded in reason.
Maybe I am misunderstanding your goal, but I would hope it is not a purely competitive one, particularly using such a profound question as you pose. If it is a real contest of “smarts” you want, include in the regimen of the semester a writing contest where the student can express their ideas in words. …
I forgot to use my emoticons. It was meant to be a joke when I said the kids were really smart. I don’t plan on having them write essays. I want to give them additional rationales to accept that God exists and is real. This also provides some symmetry because on the topic of revelation, I can teach about Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Magisterium. On reason, I can teach them some proofs that allow them to approach God without the benefit of revelation. I’m not hoping to convert the entire world, just educate some kids as competently as possible.
Communication skills are paramount when one even begins to discuss the nature of God. Remember, you are tackling a subject that the greatest of Catholic Doctors and philosophical thinkers have been working on since the beginning. They use words and certain evidence, but still there remain some who are avowed atheists.
I would be very interested in reading an essay by yourself that would give me a clearer idea of your personal idea of God, then you could take it to others to consider and contribute to it. This will establish a better communication to your young ones, but like I said, you may be very pleasantly surprised at some of the answers you will receive on many questions put to them. You will learn more by their questions they they will of yours. I am anxious to see your progress, as your task is profoundly interesting to me.
Argument from design
1st premise: design implies a designer
2nd premise: there is design in the universe
Thus, there is a universal designer, and this is God
Argument from first cause
1st premise: all things depend on something else to exist
2nd premise: this dependency cannot go on forever
Thus, there must be something that does not depend on something else, and this is God
This is about as simple as I could make it. I was planning on exploring each premise and illustrating it with some activity or anecdote in order to approach the conclusion that there must exist some transcendent being.
With regards to who / what God is, I had a separately planned class on the Trinity, the nature / characteristics of God etc. This would be more a discussion as to what they thought about God and who He was etc. I thought that it was a separate topic from whether or not there is a God.
Maybe I’m being far too ambitious in wanting to convey this to 5th graders and overreaching myself. In the “Faith and Life” books for 5th grade, one of the chapters covers Aquinas’s proofs for God’s existence (although not in much detail) so I thought that this subject matter would be appropriate. In any case, your help is greatly appreciated.