Gay Activists Ask Canada to Lower Age of Consent for Anal Sex, National Post Agrees

  • Thread starter Thread starter WanderAimlessly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

WanderAimlessly

Guest
More sickness from north of the border:
Gay Activists Ask Canada to Lower Age of Consent for Anal Sex, National Post Agrees
By John-Henry Westen

TORONTO, February 14, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Homosexual activists have long sought to distance themselves from pedophiles, however Canada’s most prominent homosexual activist group has now demanded the lowering the age of consent for anal sex to 16 from 18. Surprisingly, Canada’s National Post, regarded by some as a ‘conservative’ paper has come out in favour of the proposal.

Full Story
Click to expand...
PF
 
Here in Canada we are open minded and protect the rights of pedophiles and sexual deviants.

We are so tolerant that homosexuals and other deviants are purposely seeking to move from the US to Canada because we are tolerant and understanding.

/sarcasm

We are nothing but dummies and the fertile land of sodom and gomorra of the modern world (Toronto and Montreal).

Is there any room for my family of 5 (including 3 children) in the states anywhere? The rightcheous people within Canada are looking for places where they can live moral lives wihtout being hounded by perverts…
 
The article left me wondering: what is the age of consent for lesbian sex? Does Canada really have laws which describe different sexual acts and when it is okay to engage in them?

It seems more sensible to set one age of consent, for everyone.
 
The culture wars continue to rage on. I wish people would wake up. We need to continue to pray for the conversion of all sinners.
 
Guar Fan:
The article left me wondering: what is the age of consent for lesbian sex? Does Canada really have laws which describe different sexual acts and when it is okay to engage in them?

It seems more sensible to set one age of consent, for everyone.
Click to expand...
It makwes more sensxe to me to admit homosexuality as been the psychological disorder that it is rather than make laws making it increasingly acceptable.
 
It won’t be long before this happens here in the U.S. **NAMBLA **has been working very hard to make this happen. First you lower the age of consent for anal sex between people of the same age and then you legalize homosexual marriage and Voila! you have men marrying boys. It is already legal in this country for adult men to marry underage girls (with parental consent) homosexual men want to be given the legal right to molest young boys so pretty soon they will use this as a discrimination argument. This is not about giving teenage homosexuals sexual rights this is a slow but sure way to legalize perverted actions against our children. You give equal rights to deviant behavior you pay the consequences.

This is what COULD happen if homosexuals are allowed to marry
 
40.png
Wolseley:
Lock up your dogs, folks. They’re likely going to be next.
Click to expand...
And this my dear ladies and gentlemen is exactly how these things **DO **happen BECAUSE NO ONE BELIEVES THEY CAN HAPPEN until it’s TOO LATE.
 
We are nothing but dummies and the fertile land of sodom and gomorra of the modern world (Toronto and Montreal).
Click to expand...
Look, don’t start that please, I have explained it before why “sodomy” cannot really be compared with homosexuality.
In fact, Sodom was actually quite fertile, if you read the stories, you shall notice that Lot’s daughters are so desperate to have children (as their society demands) that they even attempt to have sex with their dad - twice.

I sincerely doubt you fears about civil unions leading to acceptance of paedophillia, just look at Spain, Britain, South Africa etc. But then again, the US is a very unique place (joking)
 
The article left me wondering: what is the age of consent for lesbian sex? Does Canada really have laws which describe different sexual acts and when it is okay to engage in them?
Click to expand...
It seems more sensible to set one age of consent, for everyone.
Click to expand...
What shocked me, was that in Irealnd (very Catholic country - or was) they age of consent for everyone is 17, except for lesbians which it is 15. In Spain it is 13 for everyone - how weird is that?
 
40.png
Libero:
Look, don’t start that please, I have explained it before why “sodomy” cannot really be compared with homosexuality.
In fact, Sodom was actually quite fertile, if you read the stories, you shall notice that Lot’s daughters are so desperate to have children (as their society demands) that they even attempt to have sex with their dad - twice.

I sincerely doubt you fears about civil unions leading to acceptance of paedophillia, just look at Spain, Britain, South Africa etc. But then again, the US is a very unique place (joking)
Click to expand...
Sounds like you’ve been reading the now ex-Father John McNeill’s The Church and the Homosexual.
From New Oxford Review article
newoxfordreview.org/article.jsp?did=0206-lee

McNeill reinterprets the story of Sodom, claiming that it does not condemn homosexuality, but gang rape. Orthodox theologians respond, in a commendable but naïve attempt to rebut him, naïve because these theologians presume that McNeill believes his own arguments, and is writing as a scholar, not as a propagandist. McNeill ignores the arguments of his critics, dismissing their objections as based on homophobia, and repeats his original position
Click to expand...
 
Sounds like you’ve been reading the now ex-Father John McNeill’s The Church and the Homosexual.
Click to expand...
Well, not John McNeils version, but for starters, one cannot claim that a Sodomite is a homosexual, as Sodom was a place, Lot was effectively a Sodomite. That would be like calling homosexuals San Franciscians due to the entire belief that SF is the unofficial gay capital of America.

Also, if you think the moral of the story behind Sodom was all about homosexuality, then I strongly recommend that you re - read the passage. There is rape, gang sex, public sex, a lack of hospitality to strangers, objectifying the human body, attempting to gain power in a situation through unecessary physical force, a man offering his daughters to rapists - these same daughters who then go on to drug their father and have sex with him - incest.

Hmmm yes, the storyt of Sodom is only about the reference to the homosexual intercourse that did not occur…
 
40.png
GloriaPatri4:
Sounds like you’ve been reading the now ex-Father John McNeill’s The Church and the Homosexual.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the link. I need to subscribe to that magazine. The issue has been longed settled. As recently as the 1980s we may read this:
…What should be noticed is that, in the presence of such remarkable diversity, there is nevertheless a clear consistency within the Scriptures themselves on the moral issue of homosexual behaviour. The Church’s doctrine regarding this issue is thus based, not on isolated phrases for facile theological argument, but on the solid foundation of a constant Biblical testimony. The community of faith today, in unbroken continuity with the Jewish and Christian communities within which the ancient Scriptures were written, continues to be nourished by those same Scriptures and by the Spirit of Truth whose Word they are. It is likewise essential to recognize that the Scriptures are not properly understood when they are interpreted in a way which contradicts the Church’s living Tradition. To be correct, the interpretation of Scripture must be in substantial accord with that Tradition…

In Genesis 3, we find that this truth about persons being an image of God has been obscured by original sin. There inevitably follows a loss of awareness of the covenantal character of the union these persons had with God and with each other. The human body retains its “spousal significance” but this is now clouded by sin. Thus, in Genesis 19:1-11, the deterioration due to sin continues in the story of the men of Sodom. There can be no doubt of the moral judgement made there against homosexual relations. In Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, in the course of describing the conditions necessary for belonging to the Chosen People, the author excludes from the People of God those who behave in a homosexual fashion…
Click to expand...
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html
Click to expand...
 
I can’t believe that anyone would accept a different, let alone lower, age of consent for anal sex than for the more traditional sex act. Such a law would provide that if a male were to have consensual vaginal sex with a female who was 16, he would be guilty of statutory rape, but if he had forced anal sex with her, the issue of whether she consented to the act would have to be proven in order to convict him, thus most likely requiring her to testify at a trial! It is ludicrous to think that it would be less traumatizing for her to have anal sex forced upon her against her will, rather than vaginal sex. Such a law also puts young men at a much greater risk of being subjected to the sexual assault of anal sex. Why do people approve of laws that endanger our precious children?

Moreover, regardless of one’s thinking about the morality of the act, medical evidence shows that homosexual men who engage in anal sex also suffer from an increased rate of anal sex - which is almost unheard of among heterosexuals.
 
I can’t believe that anyone would accept a different, let alone lower, age of consent for anal sex than for the more traditional sex act. Such a law would provide that if a male were to have consensual vaginal sex with a female who was 16, he would be guilty of statutory rape, but if he had forced anal sex with her, the issue of whether she consented to the act would have to be proven in order to convict him, thus most likely requiring her to testify at a trial! It is ludicrous to think that it would be less traumatizing for her to have anal sex forced upon her against her will, rather than vaginal sex. Such a law also puts young men at a much greater risk of being subjected to the sexual assault of anal sex. Why do people approve of laws that endanger our precious children?
Click to expand...
Do you really think that someone who is going to rape another will care about what the law says? I dont think that this shall have any real impact on the attitude towards rape.
 
The legal age for sex should be the adult age everywhere. Here in the US it’s 18, I’m not positive what is is for Canada. Marriage and sex for people over 18 should ONLY be allowed with other adults, male, female, etc. Men shouldnt be allowed to marry 13 year old girls, nor 13 year old boys, parental consent or not.
 
40.png
Libero:
Well, not John McNeils version, but for starters, one cannot claim that a Sodomite is a homosexual, as Sodom was a place, Lot was effectively a Sodomite. That would be like calling homosexuals San Franciscians due to the entire belief that SF is the unofficial gay capital of America.
…
Click to expand...
Ridiculous. It WAS a place. Now “sodomy” means anal sex, and a “sodomite” is someone who practices sodomy.
The American Heritage® Stedman’s Medical Dictionary
sod·om·y
n.

  1. *]Anal copulation of one male with another.
    *]Anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex.
    *]Copulation with an animal

    The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
    sod·om·ite
    n. One who engages in sodomy.
 
Makes sense to me. If a heterosexual couple can engage in sex, than a homosexual couple of the same age should be able to do the same.
 
NO it shouldn’t… homo sex shouldn’t be allowed under law IMO.
40.png
Gnosis:
Makes sense to me. If a heterosexual couple can engage in sex, than a homosexual couple of the same age should be able to do the same.
Click to expand...
 
40.png
GloriaPatri4:
It won’t be long before this happens here in the U.S. **NAMBLA **has been working very hard to make this happen. First you lower the age of consent for anal sex between people of the same age and then you legalize homosexual marriage and Voila! you have men marrying boys. It is already legal in this country for adult men to marry underage girls (with parental consent) homosexual men want to be given the legal right to molest young boys so pretty soon they will use this as a discrimination argument. This is not about giving teenage homosexuals sexual rights this is a slow but sure way to legalize perverted actions against our children. You give equal rights to deviant behavior you pay the consequences.

This is what COULD happen if homosexuals are allowed to marry
Click to expand...
The latest episode of “The Abundant Life” on EWTN deals with some of these matters. Guest Mary Jo Anderson raised some of these same scenerios. It’s scary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top