Gay "Jesus" arrested

  • Thread starter Thread starter cestusdei
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

cestusdei

Guest
Homosexuals work hard to say they are not prone to child abuse. After the recent scandals folks tried to blame catholicism, celibacy, an all male priesthood etc. But did they ever avoid the real issue! To even mention it led to being accused of hate crimes. Ironically by hate-filled anti-Catholic bigots. Read this though and get a glimpse of the real truth:

worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39925
 
I guess the most horrifying part of the story is its utter lack of newsworthiness. This is happening every day in virtually every town in our country. The only point that distinguishes this story is the fact that the criminal is currently in a play.

Oh Lord help us! Our country is turning pagan.
 
rfk,
My point is that if he had been a priest it would have been the lead news story on all channels and every paper. But since he is a homosexual and anti-Catholic actor you won’t see this story in the mainstream press. It doesn’t serve their agenda.
 
It’s interesting to note in some gay pride parades NAMBLA is in the parade. It’s never mentioned on the news.
 
I hope this arrest is the catylist which causes this outragiously queer play to finally shut down.

Catholic League vindicated once again! :cool:
 
40.png
cestusdei:
rfk,
My point is that if he had been a priest it would have been the lead news story on all channels and every paper. But since he is a homosexual and anti-Catholic actor you won’t see this story in the mainstream press. It doesn’t serve their agenda.
Click to expand...
The sexual abuse in the Church is different from that of other groups because the senior management of the Church sheltered and enabled the abusers. Then they tried to cover up what they did.
 
Ken,

The NEA has covered up the far worse abuse scandals in public schools. And the media has covered up the fact that homosexuals are prone to child abuse. It seems to me they are pretty selective on what cover-ups they are interested in. Last year over 200,000 children were abused. Very few by priests. But you don’t really hear about that. They are only interested if it involves the Catholic Church. The kids are pawns in their little game. Sure some of the bishops messed up big time. But in the end it is more about hurting the Church then helping the kids. That is what the bigots are in this for.
 
40.png
cestusdei:
Ken,

The NEA has covered up the far worse abuse scandals in public schools. And the media has covered up the fact that homosexuals are prone to child abuse. It seems to me they are pretty selective on what cover-ups they are interested in. Last year over 200,000 children were abused. Very few by priests. But you don’t really hear about that. They are only interested if it involves the Catholic Church. The kids are pawns in their little game. Sure some of the bishops messed up big time. But in the end it is more about hurting the Church then helping the kids. That is what the bigots are in this for.
Click to expand...
I really don’t think so. The Church situation is something of a “perfect storm” for the media.

First we have an organization that says people and society should follow it because it has a special relationship with God. When its own people fail, its much more interesting than when someone fails who does not claim special status.

Second, the senior management was deeply involved in the coverup. The media and public love a cover up. Watergate, Iran Contra, Enron, etc.

Third, there are huge lawsuits and attacks on assets involved. This brings out the trial attorneys who want a third of the take. They are very skilled at pumping the story in the media.

Fourth, it just keeps happening, even after all the media headlines and reform. The Dallas Morning News reported last month on the shuffling and coverups still happening in South America, Australia, and the Pacific.

There may be bigots involved, but I don’t see that they are the driving force here. The story has enough strength on its own merits that it doesn’t need bigots to survive. Few bigots are smart enough to engineer this kind of coverage.
 
Perfect was the word. They hate the Church and this was a great way to attack her. Often those doing the attacking don’t really care about what homosexuals refer to as “intergenerational love”. Homosexuals claim special status in our society. But they don’t want it noticed that the problem isn’t priests that abuse, but homosexuals who abuse. Our main problem was ordaining homosexuals and that is due to the climate of dissent. Rome pegged that right away. We are getting bishops now who understand that. Many of the current stories are old ones being recycled. A growing number are false. Throwing money around is a great way to encourage false claims. But the total number is maybe .1 %. Maybe that much. So what about the other 99.9 % of abused children? No one cares about them? The issue is not celibacy or theology. The issue is homosexuals who prey upon children. The cure for that is dealing firmly with the homosexuals. Not pandering to them. Mandatory reorientation counselling for starters. Good for them and good for the children.
40.png
Ken:
I really don’t think so. The Church situation is something of a “perfect storm” for the media.

First we have an organization that says people and society should follow it because it has a special relationship with God. When its own people fail, its much more interesting than when someone fails who does not claim special status.

Second, the senior management was deeply involved in the coverup. The media and public love a cover up. Watergate, Iran Contra, Enron, etc.

Third, there are huge lawsuits and attacks on assets involved. This brings out the trial attorneys who want a third of the take. They are very skilled at pumping the story in the media.

Fourth, it just keeps happening, even after all the media headlines and reform. The Dallas Morning News reported last month on the shuffling and coverups still happening in South America, Australia, and the Pacific.

There may be bigots involved, but I don’t see that they are the driving force here. The story has enough strength on its own merits that it doesn’t need bigots to survive. Few bigots are smart enough to engineer this kind of coverage.
Click to expand...
 
40.png
cestusdei:
Perfect was the word. They hate the Church and this was a great way to attack her. Often those doing the attacking don’t really care about what homosexuals refer to as “intergenerational love”. Homosexuals claim special status in our society. But they don’t want it noticed that the problem isn’t priests that abuse, but homosexuals who abuse. Our main problem was ordaining homosexuals and that is due to the climate of dissent. Rome pegged that right away. We are getting bishops now who understand that. Many of the current stories are old ones being recycled. A growing number are false. Throwing money around is a great way to encourage false claims. But the total number is maybe .1 %. Maybe that much. So what about the other 99.9 % of abused children? No one cares about them? The issue is not celibacy or theology. The issue is homosexuals who prey upon children. The cure for that is dealing firmly with the homosexuals. Not pandering to them. Mandatory reorientation counselling for starters. Good for them and good for the children.
Click to expand...
Who hates the Church? Are they in a position to control media coverage?
 
40.png
Ken:
Who hates the Church? Are they in a position to control media coverage?
Click to expand...
Our mainstream, pagan society hates the Church. Not just the Catholic Church, but other Christians (like Evangelicals and Fundamentalists) who also have the nerve to say certain things are sinful according to God’s word and those doing them should stop and repent before it’s too late. And yes, they do control the media. There’s a reason why this story wasn’t on ABC, CBS, NBC, or CNN or on the front page of the New York Times. They are in the business of promoting the homosexual agenda (including their so-called “right” to marry), and this story would have been damaging to it. But any story that defames Christianity and makes us look like intolerant, hypocrital bigots will always be front page news.
 
They do run most of the media. The elites own the big three and the New York Times. I suggest you visit the catholic league site.
 
40.png
Ellen:
Our mainstream, pagan society hates the Church. Not just the Catholic Church, but other Christians (like Evangelicals and Fundamentalists) who also have the nerve to say certain things are sinful according to God’s word and those doing them should stop and repent before it’s too late. And yes, they do control the media. There’s a reason why this story wasn’t on ABC, CBS, NBC, or CNN or on the front page of the New York Times. They are in the business of promoting the homosexual agenda (including their so-called “right” to marry), and this story would have been damaging to it. But any story that defames Christianity and makes us look like intolerant, hypocrital bigots will always be front page news.
Click to expand...
OK. Can you name some names? Who are these people who hate Christianity?

Does support of gay marriage mean someone hates Christianity? Is it possible to disagree with Christianity without hating it?

Sorry, I think I’m a bit confused about which story you are referring to that did not get coverage.
 
40.png
cestusdei:
They do run most of the media. The elites own the big three and the New York Times. I suggest you visit the catholic league site.
Click to expand...
ABC is owned by Disney.
NBC is owned by General Electric and Vivendi.
CBS is owned by Viacom.

Disney, General Electric, and Viacom are owned by millions of shareholders.

Perhaps you mean that they are managed and controlled by elites? Who are they?
 
The elites are the ones who own, operate, and control those outlets. For example Eisner despises Catholicism. Miramax, which is owned by Disney, loves to put out anti-Catholic films. Dan Rather, Peter Jennings et al. also hate the Church. Most university professors hate Catholicism. There are some exceptions, but they prove the rule. If you read The New Anti-Catholicism by Philip Jenkins he does a good job of naming names. It isn’t just individuals though. It is a minority of people educated at the same schools or in the same school of thought. Take the NEA for example. They consistantly take anti-Church stances. NARAL is another. Just get their list of membership and that will give you lots of names. But start with Jenkins book.
 
40.png
cestusdei:
The elites are the ones who own, operate, and control those outlets. For example Eisner despises Catholicism. Miramax, which is owned by Disney, loves to put out anti-Catholic films. Dan Rather, Peter Jennings et al. also hate the Church. Most university professors hate Catholicism. There are some exceptions, but they prove the rule. If you read The New Anti-Catholicism by Philip Jenkins he does a good job of naming names. It isn’t just individuals though. It is a minority of people educated at the same schools or in the same school of thought. Take the NEA for example. They consistantly take anti-Church stances. NARAL is another. Just get their list of membership and that will give you lots of names. But start with Jenkins book.
Click to expand...
OK. I asked for names, and you named the names, and I have to respect that.

But why are these people characterized as hating the Church? That is a bit strong. Many people oppose the Church’s stands on various issues. That doesn’t mean they hate the Church. It simply means they disagree with it and oppose it.

Everybody, including the Church, has a right to speak on social issues, and join in the discourse in determining social policy. Is an opposing opinion anti-Church? Why can’t it simply be a contrary position?

Are there people who oppose the Church’s policy on social issues, yet do not hate the Church?
 
If you would visit the catholic league site you can go back and cover public statements by some of these men. So when Ted Turner makes vile jokes about the Pope, calls Christians losers, or insults people who receive ashes on Ash Wednesday there is no mistaking he is hostile to us. Certainly he is a media elite. If I have a news program and cover hundreds of stories that portray Jews as greedy moneygrubbing skinflints you might eventually start to wonder if I was anti-Semitic. When you add up all the stories about Catholicism and figure out virtually all of them are negative then that tells me they are bigots. I watched a show where when they showed the Vatican the music grew dark and ominous. The words used were negative ie. reactionary, authoritarian etc. The Mass was used as a backdrop to describe terrible things about the Chuch thereby linking the two in peoples minds. It was propagada and it happens all the time. Also see Medved’s Hollywood vs. America.

Then we have homosexuals disrupting Mass, trashing churches, mocking our sacred rites, parading by St. Pat’s and flashing their genitalia…and now working to imprison anyone who believes that sodomy is sinful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top