B
beckers
Guest
I don’t know if you guys saw this but it is an interesting article. The basics is that the girl can see the sue the city of New York since their public toliet broke and caused her mother to go into labor early 4 months early. She surived but has disabilities. This was the part that caught my eye…
nydailynews.com/front/story/501161p-422561c.html
City lawyers tried to get the case dismissed before trial by arguing that the child had to have been able to survive outside the womb at the time the injuries occurred in order for her to recover damages. …
The judges were careful to craft the decision so it would not encroach into the abortion debate.
“Abortion cases are genuinely distinguishable from the [Leighton] case since fetuses which are aborted are not born alive,” Brooklyn Appeals Court Justice Gloria Goldstein wrote.
"However, if the abortion fails and causes injury to the fetus who is later born alive, the child may have a cause of action sounding in medical malpractice to recover damages for the injuries sustained."
Does this mean that childern that are aborted but come out alive now have the right to sue? Wouldn’t that make the person (the bothced aborted baby) have rights and therfore all those cases were childern are born after an abortion but left to die would now have the right to live??
Peace,
Beckers
nydailynews.com/front/story/501161p-422561c.html
City lawyers tried to get the case dismissed before trial by arguing that the child had to have been able to survive outside the womb at the time the injuries occurred in order for her to recover damages. …
The judges were careful to craft the decision so it would not encroach into the abortion debate.
“Abortion cases are genuinely distinguishable from the [Leighton] case since fetuses which are aborted are not born alive,” Brooklyn Appeals Court Justice Gloria Goldstein wrote.
"However, if the abortion fails and causes injury to the fetus who is later born alive, the child may have a cause of action sounding in medical malpractice to recover damages for the injuries sustained."
Does this mean that childern that are aborted but come out alive now have the right to sue? Wouldn’t that make the person (the bothced aborted baby) have rights and therfore all those cases were childern are born after an abortion but left to die would now have the right to live??
Peace,
Beckers