R
rightness
Guest
Giving to the poor isn’t so straightforward these days. In Jesus’s time, you could really only buy food to eat. Now, a person can buy a lot of vices that you can’t really know the intentions of that person. To counter this, we have food banks, homeless shelters, and job search facilities to help them.
Even giving food, in my experience, is equivalent to giving money because if they do have any money for themselves, giving them food excuses them from spending on necessities and permits them to buy drugs or cigarettes. I had given this seemingly homeless guy a couple of muffins before, but when I saw him again, after receiving some money, he whips out his smart phone and I was close enough to hear him say something about “doing a trade”.
We’re called to give to the poor, but the current social environment makes it dangerous to give to the poor traditionally. What I mean by dangerous is that it endangers their lives if our alms is used for drugs. We might be causing their addiction to get worse. I feel like it’s more responsible not to.
The thing we could do is tell them where to find shelters and food banks. Our taxes (at least my government) go towards these social programs to help the poor, therefore, I think it’s not necessary and better not to give alms directly. Of course, our church is also a great place to give donations to because the church does a lot of work for the needs of the poor.
Would you give alms to a poor person? Would you entrust our social systems that help the poor?
Even giving food, in my experience, is equivalent to giving money because if they do have any money for themselves, giving them food excuses them from spending on necessities and permits them to buy drugs or cigarettes. I had given this seemingly homeless guy a couple of muffins before, but when I saw him again, after receiving some money, he whips out his smart phone and I was close enough to hear him say something about “doing a trade”.
We’re called to give to the poor, but the current social environment makes it dangerous to give to the poor traditionally. What I mean by dangerous is that it endangers their lives if our alms is used for drugs. We might be causing their addiction to get worse. I feel like it’s more responsible not to.
The thing we could do is tell them where to find shelters and food banks. Our taxes (at least my government) go towards these social programs to help the poor, therefore, I think it’s not necessary and better not to give alms directly. Of course, our church is also a great place to give donations to because the church does a lot of work for the needs of the poor.
Would you give alms to a poor person? Would you entrust our social systems that help the poor?